Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #181  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:50 PM
Kevmath Kevmath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 8,656
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

Steve Cohen, TN - 9th district
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:51 PM
Uglyowl Uglyowl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: They r who we thought they were
Posts: 4,406
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

I did laugh when Goodlatte did his "withdrawal" demostration by extending his arms and tucking a non-existent object into his stomach. What a dork.
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:52 PM
1p0kerboy 1p0kerboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 492k
Posts: 6,026
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

Wow he rocked.
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:55 PM
zimmer879 zimmer879 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 295
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

Is Frank's bill compliant with the WTO or not? If it wasn't it would seem that Goodlatte would have brought that up.
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:55 PM
iponnet iponnet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 552
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

I dont know if this is possible but duke just ripped latte a new one
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:56 PM
tangled tangled is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 318
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

Oops Duke is wrong about the states and the WTO.If any states opt out or any sports league opts out, we will still be outside the WTO decision.
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 11-14-2007, 02:59 PM
JPFisher55 JPFisher55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 963
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Oops Duke is wrong about the states and the WTO.If any states opt out or any sports league opts out, we will still be outside the WTO decision.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. She should be arguing that no state or federal government should restrict the individual freedom to gamble online in their own home. However, we may be better off hiding the truth about the IGREA until the WTO grants IP sanctions to Antiqua.
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 11-14-2007, 03:08 PM
flight2q flight2q is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: waking up with cowboys
Posts: 379
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

I want to have Steve Cohen's love child.

And.. lol at FoF freak, who at first doesn't recognize the word "fun".
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 11-14-2007, 03:09 PM
ahmngrn30 ahmngrn30 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 111
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[ QUOTE ]
I want to have Steve Cohen's love child.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you have any studies to back up that statement?
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 11-14-2007, 03:15 PM
zimmer879 zimmer879 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 295
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Oops Duke is wrong about the states and the WTO.If any states opt out or any sports league opts out, we will still be outside the WTO decision.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. She should be arguing that no state or federal government should restrict the individual freedom to gamble online in their own home. However, we may be better off hiding the truth about the IGREA until the WTO grants IP sanctions to Antiqua.

[/ QUOTE ]

Weiler posed a hypothetical to Goodlatte along the lines of, "If the technolgy existed to allow remote gaming to only the states in which it was legal, what would be the DOJ's position?" I don't want to put words in his mouth, but doesn't this seem to imply that there might be some workaround room for states rights in regards to the WTO?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.