Phil Laak on high stakes poker season 4

[Gene Fish]

I'll ship over some of mine too but I'll need a SS# and credit card # as Id verification

[Dalek]

[ QUOTE ]
Also there are 2 schools of thought, you could almost consider it 3 really. There is the Phil Hellmuth/Jeff Lisandro types (bitter complainers), the Antonio/Laak/Negreanu types (put on a show to guarantee TV time) and the Howard Lederer types. If you like the last type you likely don't like the first two. But if you want to have a good time at a poker table the guys in the middle are solid gold and you will enjoy every second and when you are there you wouldn't find it obnoxious. That is part of what makes them all so good.

[/ QUOTE ]

I like the Lederer types because they seem like good guys and the hellmuth types because they're funny unless they take it too far (Tony G). I don't like Laak or Antonius much

[charliecozz]

[ QUOTE ]
He and Esfandiari are a great combo

[/ QUOTE ]They were great on PAD. Best episode I ever saw was when those 2 were heads up and Esfandiari called him a lucky irish prick.

[Taso]

[ QUOTE ]
I'll ship over some of mine too but I'll need a SS# and credit card # as Id verification

[/ QUOTE ]

K, sent in PM.

[Gene Fish]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'll ship over some of mine too but I'll need a SS# and credit card # as Id verification

[/ QUOTE ]

K, sent in PM.

[/ QUOTE ]

woah! the naked pic of yourself that you sent me was unnecessary

[Taso]

my bad.

[wstaffor]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'll ship over some of mine too but I'll need a SS# and credit card # as Id verification

[/ QUOTE ]

K, sent in PM.

[/ QUOTE ]

woah! the naked pic of yourself that you sent me was unnecessary

[/ QUOTE ]

though surely appreciated

[Scorcho]

I like how Brunson pulls the complete douchebag angle-shoot move and Phil Laak, merely wanting a ruling on whether that's allowable in case it happens again in the future, is branded as the a-hole.

[RichGangi]

Maybe it's because Phil Laak got a taste of his own medicine for once. What goes around comes around, as they say.

[NicksDad1970]

[ QUOTE ]
I like how Brunson pulls the complete douchebag angle-shoot move and Phil Laak, merely wanting a ruling on whether that's allowable in case it happens again in the future, is branded as the a-hole.

[/ QUOTE ]

I asked a question earlier that noone really answered. If he does something that's totally within the rules how is that a bad thing? I'm not saying that as in anything goes. I'm really curious if it should be widely considered a douchey thing to do if it's within the rules.

Even if at that particular casino decides it is against the rules Gabe himself said that where Todd normally plays that move is allowed.

So if that's correct is it still douchey?