#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You never fold a set on the flop, right? Even bottom set against a
You are looking at 76hh/54hh and 77 here a majority of the time. Even nits sometimes do random stupid [censored] and he might push weaker draws also means you probably have to call.
Would kind of expect him to push these draws more often than just raising to 118. Yucky spot, one of those push and expect to be coolered spots. And then more often than you would think the pot gets showed to you and you have to look in the HH to see what he spazzed out with. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You never fold a set on the flop, right? Even bottom set against a
His pf and aggression stats are fine and reliable after a few houndred hands. They converge very fast.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You never fold a set on the flop, right? Even bottom set against a
Would you fold AA here?
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You never fold a set on the flop, right? Even bottom set against a
[ QUOTE ]
No where near deep enough to fold a set on that board. I'd need more than a couple of hundred mined hands to even think twice before I get it all in. [/ QUOTE ] |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You never fold a set on the flop, right? Even bottom set against a
[ QUOTE ]
His pf and aggression stats are fine and reliable after a few houndred hands. They converge very fast. [/ QUOTE ] This definitely isn't true of aggression. And I was referring to OPs read that this guy always has a set here. It takes way more than a few hundred played hands to have that read. |
|
|