|
|
|
|
#1
12-01-2007, 12:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** Official *** BluffTHIS! Cyrus accusation containment thread
[ QUOTE ]
mrick chances of being cyrus are between 33% and 20%, discuss. [/ QUOTE ] 10 seconds worth of effort to perform a user name search shows that Mickey/Cyrus was banned ~Mar 07 while mrick reg'd Apr 06 and has been a regular since it looks like. Of course, let's not let inconvenient facts or a little sleuthing get in the way of a Bluffthistroll's witch hunt. 
|
|
#2
12-01-2007, 12:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official *** BluffTHIS! Cyrus accusation containment thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] mrick chances of being cyrus are between 33% and 20%, discuss. [/ QUOTE ] 10 seconds worth of effort to perform a user name search shows that Mickey/Cyrus was banned ~Mar 07 while mrick reg'd Apr 06 and has been a regular since it looks like. Of course, let's not let inconvenient facts or a little sleuthing get in the way of a Bluffthistroll's witch hunt. [/ QUOTE ] 1) I meant that because bluff had accused 6 to 10 ppl and he had been right twice 2) Some of u are missing the point, its not whether mrick is cyrus or not its about how can someone give a [censored] on whether mrick is cyrus or not
|
|
#3
12-01-2007, 12:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official *** BluffTHIS! Cyrus accusation containment thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] mrick chances of being cyrus are between 33% and 20%, discuss. [/ QUOTE ] 10 seconds worth of effort to perform a user name search shows that Mickey/Cyrus was banned ~Mar 07 while mrick reg'd Apr 06 and has been a regular since it looks like. Of course, let's not let inconvenient facts or a little sleuthing get in the way of a Bluffthistroll's witch hunt. [/ QUOTE ] 1) I meant that because bluff had accused 6 to 10 ppl and he had been right twice 2) Some of u are missing the point, its not whether mrick is cyrus or not its about how can someone give a [censored] on whether mrick is cyrus or not [/ QUOTE ] My bad. My comment was aimed at Bluffthis throwing out accusations without the 10 sec worth of effort to show his accusations are almost surely false. I understood that you were throwing out percentages sarcastically but used your comment in making my point. Apologies. And agree about the "who cares" part. Frankly, I'm sure most 2+2ers are more upset that Bluffthistroll came back from his staring contest (w/ pokerbob was it?) than if cyrus came back.
|
|
#4
12-01-2007, 12:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official *** BluffTHIS! Cyrus accusation containment thread
I'm Cyrus!
Now everyone... (apologies to Kirk Douglas, Spartacus)
|
|
#6
12-01-2007, 02:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official *** BluffTHIS! Cyrus accusation containment thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] mrick chances of being cyrus are between 33% and 20%, discuss. [/ QUOTE ] 10 seconds worth of effort to perform a user name search shows that Mickey/Cyrus was banned ~Mar 07 while mrick reg'd Apr 06 and has been a regular since it looks like. Of course, let's not let inconvenient facts or a little sleuthing get in the way of a Bluffthistroll's witch hunt. [/ QUOTE ] And this proves he isnt the same person how?
|
|
#7
12-01-2007, 05:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official *** BluffTHIS! Cyrus accusation containment thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] mrick chances of being cyrus are between 33% and 20%, discuss. [/ QUOTE ] 10 seconds worth of effort to perform a user name search shows that Mickey/Cyrus was banned ~Mar 07 while mrick reg'd Apr 06 and has been a regular since it looks like. Of course, let's not let inconvenient facts or a little sleuthing get in the way of a Bluffthistroll's witch hunt. [/ QUOTE ] And this proves he isnt the same person how? [/ QUOTE ] Proof? Where did I claim to "prove" anything? Even a court of law only requires reasonable doubt. I just gave you plenty of grounds for that. So where's the "proof" that he is in fact Cyrus? Let us see it.
|
|
#8
12-01-2007, 05:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official *** BluffTHIS! Cyrus accusation containment thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] mrick chances of being cyrus are between 33% and 20%, discuss. [/ QUOTE ] 10 seconds worth of effort to perform a user name search shows that Mickey/Cyrus was banned ~Mar 07 while mrick reg'd Apr 06 and has been a regular since it looks like. Of course, let's not let inconvenient facts or a little sleuthing get in the way of a Bluffthistroll's witch hunt. [/ QUOTE ] And this proves he isnt the same person how? [/ QUOTE ] Proof? Where did I claim to "prove" anything? Even a court of law only requires reasonable doubt. I just gave you plenty of grounds for that. So where's the "proof" that he is in fact Cyrus? Let us see it. [/ QUOTE ] Ok Im really not down with getting involved in this drama. I just thought it was ridiculous to use that as proof or even reasonable doubt in the case of a person that was known to have used more than one account. It might raise a hint of doubt but thats about it. As for proving, I really dont care if it is or isnt Cyrus. I could find out pretty easily if I cared since we correspond via email from time to time. But I will enjoy this thread too much to short circuit it at this point in time.
|
|
#9
12-01-2007, 10:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official *** BluffTHIS! Cyrus accusation containment thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] mrick chances of being cyrus are between 33% and 20%, discuss. [/ QUOTE ] 10 seconds worth of effort to perform a user name search shows that Mickey/Cyrus was banned ~Mar 07 while mrick reg'd Apr 06 and has been a regular since it looks like. Of course, let's not let inconvenient facts or a little sleuthing get in the way of a Bluffthistroll's witch hunt. [/ QUOTE ] And this proves he isnt the same person how? [/ QUOTE ] Proof? Where did I claim to "prove" anything? Even a court of law only requires reasonable doubt. I just gave you plenty of grounds for that. So where's the "proof" that he is in fact Cyrus? Let us see it. [/ QUOTE ] Ok Im really not down with getting involved in this drama. I just thought it was ridiculous to use that as proof or even reasonable doubt in the case of a person that was known to have used more than one account.... [/ QUOTE ] Why would Cyrus have come back as Mickey Brausch once he was banned if he was already actively using the mrick account? You really don't think there's even a hint of "reasonable doubt" here? I sincerely hope you never serve on a jury or court-martial, sir.
|
|
#10
12-01-2007, 10:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official *** BluffTHIS! Cyrus accusation containment thread
[ QUOTE ]
Why would Cyrus have come back as Mickey Brausch once he was banned if he was already actively using the mrick account? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not convinced that mrick = cyrus, but Cyrus is NOT dumb and he was SO transparent in posting as MB that he had to figure that someone would catch on and give him the boot.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
