|
View Poll Results: Idiotic or Genius? | |||
Idiotic | 14 | 93.33% | |
Genius | 1 | 6.67% | |
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Francisco goes after trans fats too
[ QUOTE ]
However, in this case they take the right approach. article Restaurants which are certified by the city to be "trans fat free" will get a nice pretty certificate to post in their window. So, my question for the nannies is, how hard was that? [/ QUOTE ] First off, I prefer the term "Nancy" or "Nancies". Second, that idea never occurred to us. Our bad. Please forward this thread to the City of New York. Thanks in advance. Love, The Nancies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Francisco goes after trans fats too
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] However, in this case they take the right approach. article Restaurants which are certified by the city to be "trans fat free" will get a nice pretty certificate to post in their window. So, my question for the nannies is, how hard was that? [/ QUOTE ] Second, that idea never occurred to us. Our bad. Please forward this thread to the City of New York. Thanks in advance. [/ QUOTE ] The sad thing is I can't tell if this is sincere or not. Since this alternative approach was actually discussed *at length* in the original transfat ban thread, I think it may be a joke. In which case, I'd still love to hear why banning is preferable to informing. On the other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if people are that unwilling to entertain a solution unless government approves of it first. Suddenly it's a viable government solution, because govt chose that solution. natedogg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: San Francisco goes after trans fats too
In my experince, its not just the low level places that use transfats.
I believe there should be a symbol next to each menu item that contains transfat. That way people will understand more about how their food is being cooked. |
|
|