|
View Poll Results: Who would make a better STTF Mod? | |||
Omahahaha | 3 | 15.79% | |
My butt hole | 16 | 84.21% | |
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: M2TR shortstacker illuminati thread
Nice start.
I think defining a particular villain's call range to be the most difficult. Some are more stubborn than others, but , to me, there isn't a good HUD stat that helps me set the call range. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: M2TR shortstacker illuminati thread
[ QUOTE ]
f(R+1.5) + c(w((E+1.5)-1/20(2E+1.5))-l(E)) > 0 where f = % of time initial raiser folds to push c = % of time initial raiser calls push R = Open raise size of initial raiser w = win % of pushing hand v initial raiser's calling range l = loss % of pushing hand v initial raiser's calling range [/ QUOTE ] I feel like I'm watching some bad WW II movie. "Yu hev zee sekrit foemoola? May I zee it?" BTW, if the 2+2 forum server crashes tonight and MT2R never posts again, I promise I'll never buy in for less than the max... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: M2TR shortstacker illuminati thread
[ QUOTE ]
Nice start. I think defining a particular villain's call range to be the most difficult. Some are more stubborn than others, but , to me, there isn't a good HUD stat that helps me set the call range. [/ QUOTE ] yep...that just comes from experience as it is extreme from individual to individual how they will respond to shortstackers this brings up the equilibrium solution the graph and example I should had to do with exploitive solutions--trying to maximize verse a particular opponent however, one can just come up with a bland equilibrium solution that will be +ev verse any calling range play around in pokerstove and find the hands that work no matter the villain calling range |
|
|