pretty standard fold of the nuts here right?

[SossMan]

since you didn't raise preflop 3 handed with an ace, this has a higher than normal probability of being a bluff. A laydown is pretty awful, IMO.

[A_PLUS]

[ QUOTE ]
since you didn't raise preflop 3 handed with an ace, this has a higher than normal probability of being a bluff. A laydown is pretty awful, IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you imagine the look on the bluffers face when you fold the nuts face up. Might be worth it.

[JCool]

Bluffing 350k into a 60k pot with a 4 card straight on the board? That would be truly even more awful then folding the nuts.

[nath]

"Don't fold the nuts" should be part of anyone's basic strategy.

[registrar]

You are kidding?

[Vraket]

Risk 450k to win 18k?

I'd say villain dependant [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] I like to push Acerag of clubs here since other ace calls 993/1000.

Might fold this unless villain is capable of pushing the sucker end or a 2 pair.

It's risking very much to win very little, unless villain is a complete ##tard.

[Rekwob]

obviously if i think theres a chance he doesnt have the straight i call here, but really, it'd be a suicidal bluff wouldnt it?

so basically im putting my whole stack on the line to win a split of the pot. i dont see why i should do that, but i guess i must be wrong.

[mornelth]

there's a small chance villain has Acxc and freerolling for flush - which he will catch 1 out of 5 times. There's a god chance he has a split with you but hoping he can bluff you out / catch you with a 9. There's a 10% chance he has 2 pair or a 9 - or thinks you do not have the A and is bluffing. You call for that 10%.

[adanthar]

If this were PLO or you had 1M behind this would be standard, but you aren't deep enough for that.

[Rekwob]

is calling for a split really that important though, im risking 360k to get 40k, and surely him I'm never sccoping? maybe im crazy but if he doesnt have the A here its a suicidal bluff surely? i really dont think the 10% bluffing rule applies here