|
|
#1
11-06-2007, 12:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Slip up or something more....
D.R says "Shot down the plane" dunno if any of you have seen this footage but interesting I think.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cd0_1194330997 
|
|
#2
11-06-2007, 12:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Slip up or something more....
Zomg conspiracy.
See, this is what I don't understand: Let's say the US was behind it all. Then why does a plane need to be shot down in the first place? If DR was in cahoots with whoever was flying the plane, why not just crash it to keep the story straight? When will all this nonsense stop? You guys give people who legitimately call fouls bad company. Stop it.
|
|
#3
11-06-2007, 01:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Slip up or something more....
This is a possibility...
Plane crashes into trade center Plane crashes into trade center Plane crashes into pentagon another plane is hijacked. US military analyzes situation, decides to shoot down plane rather than allow it to crash into populated area
|
|
#4
11-06-2007, 01:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Slip up or something more....
[ QUOTE ]
This is a possibility... Plane crashes into trade center Plane crashes into trade center Plane crashes into pentagon another plane is hijacked. US military analyzes situation, decides to shoot down plane rather than allow it to crash into populated area [/ QUOTE ] You're bad at conspiracies. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#5
11-06-2007, 01:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Slip up or something more....
[ QUOTE ]
This is a possibility... Plane crashes into trade center Plane crashes into trade center Plane crashes into pentagon another plane is hijacked. US military analyzes situation, decides to shoot down plane rather than allow it to crash into populated area [/ QUOTE ] So the widows of Flight 93 are lying about the convos they had with thier husbands about "taking back" the plane?
|
|
#6
11-06-2007, 01:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Slip up or something more....
I never said "conspiracy" just that he def said shot down when no one else in senior gov has said similar statement. I gave the vid evidence so you can decide yourself if it was a gaff or a legit comment.
|
|
#7
11-06-2007, 02:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Slip up or something more....
[ QUOTE ]
This is a possibility... Plane crashes into trade center Plane crashes into trade center Plane crashes into pentagon another plane is hijacked. US military analyzes situation, decides to shoot down plane rather than allow it to crash into populated area [/ QUOTE ] clarify: I don't believe this happened, I'm just saying it would be a possible scenario
|
|
#8
11-06-2007, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Slip up or something more....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This is a possibility... Plane crashes into trade center Plane crashes into trade center Plane crashes into pentagon another plane is hijacked. US military analyzes situation, decides to shoot down plane rather than allow it to crash into populated area [/ QUOTE ] clarify: I don't believe this happened, I'm just saying it would be a possible scenario [/ QUOTE ] It's certainly a plausible scenario, but the fact that it's so bland makes it, paradoxically, less likely to be true. Why would anyone cover it up? I remember that a big fuss about how they fighters patroling big cities post-9/11, presumably for the purpose of shooting down hijacked airliners.
|
|
#9
11-06-2007, 02:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Slip up or something more....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This is a possibility... Plane crashes into trade center Plane crashes into trade center Plane crashes into pentagon another plane is hijacked. US military analyzes situation, decides to shoot down plane rather than allow it to crash into populated area [/ QUOTE ] So the widows of Flight 93 are lying about the convos they had with thier husbands about "taking back" the plane? [/ QUOTE ] The passengers having a plan to take back the plane does not prove that the government didn't shoot it down. I'm just sayin. This is still a stupid thread.
|
|
#10
11-06-2007, 02:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Slip up or something more....
[ QUOTE ]
So the widows of Flight 93 are lying about the convos they had with thier husbands about "taking back" the plane? [/ QUOTE ] at least one person was lying. who are the other people? it may all come from this one person. (who is high in gov and hence probably a scum) http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd319.htm [ QUOTE ] "However, the evidence from the Moussaoui trial ruled out this possibility. In its report on AA 77, it listed one attempted call from Barbara Olson, which was "unconnected" and hence lasted "0 seconds." This was an astounding discovery. The FBI is part of the Department of Justice. And yet it had undercut the testimony of the DOJ's former solicitor general, saying in effect that the two calls that he reported had never happened. The implication is that unless Ted Olson had, like Deena Burnett, been duped, he had lied. Although this should have produced front-page headlines, it has thus far not been reported by any mainstream publication. The Revised and Updated Edition of "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" provides the documentation for these reports from American Airlines and the FBI, which pretty thoroughly undermine the idea that any of the reported calls were genuine: If the cell phone calls were faked, why should we believe that the reported calls from onboard phones were genuine?" [/ QUOTE ]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
