#71
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
its a fold, but not as obv as you guys seem to think. him flat calling the turn is a pretty big sign he doesn't have JTdd, but him shoving river is an even bigger sign that he does.
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
I think it's a clear fold, but even if I thought it's close, I'd still fold, bc getting stacked this way by a nit, would put me on a 1 month stonecold tilt...
|
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i dunno, i don't see him flat calling turn with J10 i call [/ QUOTE ] You just made the best argument for why he should flat call. If he can screw up your handreading bad enough that you make a 2200 dollar mistake in a 60 dollar pot--- He should flat call alot. I'm too lazy to do the math but its a decent play. Anyhow, this nit is never bluffing. Its a matter of whether or not his misclick allin percentage is greater than 40% in this spot. I fold. [/ QUOTE ] This is a good post. LOL at the people (a few being typically good posters) justifying a call w/ his turn line. If this guy had 1k less, I'm still folding on the river |
|
|