|
|
|
|
#2
11-29-2007, 04:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Survivor Football -- Week 13
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Vikes, Vikes, Vikes. [/ QUOTE ] Yikes, yikes, yikes. They're a very inconsistent team. [/ QUOTE ] And Detroit isn't? Min isn't a bad choice imo. 
|
|
#3
11-30-2007, 01:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Survivor Football -- Week 13
should be a no brainer with Denver hopefully. SF sucks, but the Panthers defense has absolutely sucked nuts the last 2 weeks. Vikes, very inconsistent and Peterson is not 100%. Although the rams have pulled in 2 wins, they are still awful. Denver or Cleveland definitely.
|
|
#4
11-30-2007, 01:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Survivor Football -- Week 13
Rams (with Bulger) I could see, even Denver. But Cleveland? The market has them pk right now against Arizona! That would be a horrible play, unless you think that line is off by about 4 pts. If you think that though, you should be sticking about 10% of your bankroll on the Browns.
I don't even think Cleveland is a favorite in that game, let alone the best favorite of your options.
|
|
#5
11-30-2007, 02:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Survivor Football -- Week 13
[ QUOTE ]
should be a no brainer with Denver hopefully. SF sucks, but the Panthers defense has absolutely sucked nuts the last 2 weeks. Vikes, very inconsistent and Peterson is not 100%. Although the rams have pulled in 2 wins, they are still awful. Denver or Cleveland definitely. [/ QUOTE ] Denver needed overtime to beat Oakland when they played at Mile High. They're just another very up-and-down team. Cutler looked good on Sunday tho.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
