Comment on this statement...

[kiddo]

[img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[Fiddler]

[ QUOTE ]

You should try posting in small stakes short handed.

[/ QUOTE ]

Please don't.

[CarpeDiem]

VNH

[veganmav]

lol state-a-ments

[The Bryce]

Veg, if you bring that [censored] into this forum I will find out where you live and personally kick your dog.

[veganmav]

[ QUOTE ]
Veg, if you bring that [censored] into this forum I will find out where you live and personally kick your dog.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] my dog is getting old and is gonna die soon too.. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

How is your 60k coming ?

[Bill King]

[ QUOTE ]
the statement makes no sense, it's the complete oppositte of an equlibrium, and therefore, should never happen

I don't think any good discussion could come from it at all as it is false

Edit: so, the statement, "if play increased to expert level for all players (each player was playing with perfect information i guess) then everyone would break even" would be the true one.

But that is not possible as well

[/ QUOTE ]

this thread has officially done it.

i am quitting poker, and playing craps.

because nobody wins in poker in wild games right?

wait a minute........ so my school is actually free? ughhhhh

[danzasmack]

huh?