|
|
|
|
#3
10-22-2006, 07:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MNF - Giants @ Boys
[ QUOTE ]
I love Dallas. Can't see the Giants going 3-0 in the division with 2 road wins. [/ QUOTE ] You think Dallas and the Giants are even teams on a neutral field? I don't. I expect Giants to win outright. 
|
|
#4
10-22-2006, 08:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MNF - Giants @ Boys
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I love Dallas. Can't see the Giants going 3-0 in the division with 2 road wins. [/ QUOTE ] You think Dallas and the Giants are even teams on a neutral field? I don't. I expect Giants to win outright. [/ QUOTE ] Yes I think Dallas is every bit as good on a neutral field. I also think homefield in this one is worth a little something extra given that it's a more important game for Dallas. Both teams are shakey @QB; though the Cowboys problems in that area have just been more publicized because of the endless hype on the Philly game and their guy isn't named "Manning". In any case Bledsoe is generally ok at home.
|
|
#5
10-22-2006, 08:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MNF - Giants @ Boys
My numbers show the Giants and Cowboys to be a PICK'EM on a neutral field. Throw in home field advantage and you've got the line pretty much where it is now.
I see now value either way, so I'm saving my money for next week. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#7
10-22-2006, 08:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MNF - Giants @ Boys
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I love Dallas. Can't see the Giants going 3-0 in the division with 2 road wins. [/ QUOTE ] You think Dallas and the Giants are even teams on a neutral field? I don't. I expect Giants to win outright. [/ QUOTE ] Yes I think Dallas is every bit as good on a neutral field. I also think homefield in this one is worth a little something extra given that it's a more important game for Dallas. Both teams are shakey @QB; though the Cowboys problems in that area have just been more publicized because of the endless hype on the Philly game and their guy isn't named "Manning". In any case Bledsoe is generally ok at home. [/ QUOTE ] Fair enough. I would just like to see the Cowboys beat a team that doesn't suck and blow before I start thinking they're not bad. Then again, a win tomorrow puts them right at the top of the division, so...
|
|
#8
10-22-2006, 11:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MNF - Giants @ Boys
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I love Dallas. Can't see the Giants going 3-0 in the division with 2 road wins. [/ QUOTE ] You think Dallas and the Giants are even teams on a neutral field? I don't. I expect Giants to win outright. [/ QUOTE ] Yes I think Dallas is every bit as good on a neutral field. I also think homefield in this one is worth a little something extra given that it's a more important game for Dallas. Both teams are shakey @QB; though the Cowboys problems in that area have just been more publicized because of the endless hype on the Philly game and their guy isn't named "Manning". In any case Bledsoe is generally ok at home. [/ QUOTE ] How are the Giants "shakey" at QB? Manning has thrown for an average of 265.8 yrds/g and has completed 65.3% and has a QB rating of 92.3. The Giants haven't had publicized problems in that area not because his last name is Manning but because Eli has been good. What is "shakey" is your reasoning.
|
|
#9
10-23-2006, 12:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MNF - Giants @ Boys
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I love Dallas. Can't see the Giants going 3-0 in the division with 2 road wins. [/ QUOTE ] You think Dallas and the Giants are even teams on a neutral field? I don't. I expect Giants to win outright. [/ QUOTE ] Yes I think Dallas is every bit as good on a neutral field. I also think homefield in this one is worth a little something extra given that it's a more important game for Dallas. Both teams are shakey @QB; though the Cowboys problems in that area have just been more publicized because of the endless hype on the Philly game and their guy isn't named "Manning". In any case Bledsoe is generally ok at home. [/ QUOTE ] How are the Giants "shakey" at QB? Manning has thrown for an average of 265.8 yrds/g and has completed 65.3% and has a QB rating of 92.3. The Giants haven't had publicized problems in that area not because his last name is Manning but because Eli has been good. What is "shakey" is your reasoning. [/ QUOTE ] OK we'll see...if you just go by stats then Bledsoe is first ballot HOF.
|
|
#10
10-24-2006, 12:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MNF - Giants @ Boys
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I love Dallas. Can't see the Giants going 3-0 in the division with 2 road wins. [/ QUOTE ] You think Dallas and the Giants are even teams on a neutral field? I don't. I expect Giants to win outright. [/ QUOTE ] Yes I think Dallas is every bit as good on a neutral field. I also think homefield in this one is worth a little something extra given that it's a more important game for Dallas. Both teams are shakey @QB; though the Cowboys problems in that area have just been more publicized because of the endless hype on the Philly game and their guy isn't named "Manning". In any case Bledsoe is generally ok at home. [/ QUOTE ] You're an idiot for going against me. I mean, it's not like my WP against the spread last year was 30% or anything. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
