Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-29-2007, 03:12 PM
McStinky McStinky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 212
Default 10/25 NL live I am bad at 3-betting

Foxwoods 10/25, 8-handed.

I have never played with villain before but I recognize him as a very solid pro. Yes, I realize that means I should be careful putting moves on him but for some reason I couldn't help myself.

I have 2800, villain covers.

I am in the SB with J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], and villain is on the button.

Preflop
All fold to villain who raises to 75. I reraise to 260 and he calls.

Flop (550): A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
I check, villain checks.

Turn (550): 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
I bet 400, villain calls.

River (1350): K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
I bet 750. I am trying to represent AA, KK, AK, or maybe AQ here. But now I'm thinking any bet here is stupid. After he calls on the turn, I don't think enough changes on the river that he would then fold.

Comments on all streets appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-29-2007, 03:29 PM
limon limon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: los angeles
Posts: 1,478
Default Re: 10/25 NL live I am bad at 3-betting

[ QUOTE ]
Foxwoods 10/25, 8-handed.

I have never played with villain before but I recognize him as a very solid pro. Yes, I realize that means I should be careful putting moves on him but for some reason I couldn't help myself.

I have 2800, villain covers.

I am in the SB with J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], and villain is on the button.

Preflop
All fold to villain who raises to 75. I reraise to 260 and he calls.

Flop (550): A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
I check, villain checks.

Turn (550): 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
I bet 400, villain calls.

River (1350): K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
I bet 750. I am trying to represent AA, KK, AK, or maybe AQ here. But now I'm thinking any bet here is stupid. After he calls on the turn, I don't think enough changes on the river that he would then fold.

Comments on all streets appreciated.

[/ QUOTE ]

checking the flop is bad...i hate having to think about what to do after you guys dig yourself into such deep holes...POKER ISNT THIS HARD!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-29-2007, 03:37 PM
runningirl07 runningirl07 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 402
Default Re: 10/25 NL live I am bad at 3-betting

Yes you have to bet this flop here for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-29-2007, 03:38 PM
teomcolcott teomcolcott is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 12
Default Re: 10/25 NL live I am bad at 3-betting

checking on the flop is your first mistake because you could of done a probe bet in which you bet 1/2 of the pot if he goes over the top then you know that your beat but checking you just gave him a free card to beat you. with an 8 on the turn you beat 400 which is a good size bet but there is 2 hearts on the board. with him calling the 400 bet he was getting 2-1 odds which on a draw those are favorable odds the river card was another mistake because its another over card to your jacks. and betting 750 and trying to represent bullets was a bad move because you should of bet on the flop. what was the outcome of the hand?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-29-2007, 03:46 PM
McStinky McStinky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 212
Default Re: 10/25 NL live I am bad at 3-betting

[ QUOTE ]
checking on the flop is your first mistake because you could of done a probe bet in which you bet 1/2 of the pot if he goes over the top then you know that your beat but checking you just gave him a free card to beat you. with an 8 on the turn you beat 400 which is a good size bet but there is 2 hearts on the board. with him calling the 400 bet he was getting 2-1 odds which on a draw those are favorable odds the river card was another mistake because its another over card to your jacks. and betting 750 and trying to represent bullets was a bad move because you should of bet on the flop. what was the outcome of the hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you misread my hand. I had JT and was just making a move.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-29-2007, 03:49 PM
EC10 EC10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: not folding
Posts: 2,471
Default Re: 10/25 NL live I am bad at 3-betting

if you did decide to ch flop and bet turn like you did, you should overbet the river
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-29-2007, 03:51 PM
limon limon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: los angeles
Posts: 1,478
Default Re: 10/25 NL live I am bad at 3-betting

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
checking on the flop is your first mistake because you could of done a probe bet in which you bet 1/2 of the pot if he goes over the top then you know that your beat but checking you just gave him a free card to beat you. with an 8 on the turn you beat 400 which is a good size bet but there is 2 hearts on the board. with him calling the 400 bet he was getting 2-1 odds which on a draw those are favorable odds the river card was another mistake because its another over card to your jacks. and betting 750 and trying to represent bullets was a bad move because you should of bet on the flop. what was the outcome of the hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you misread my hand. I had JT and was just making a move.

[/ QUOTE ]

nah you made a move to set you up to make a move and then you didnt make your move.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-29-2007, 03:55 PM
McStinky McStinky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 212
Default Re: 10/25 NL live I am bad at 3-betting

[ QUOTE ]
Yes you have to bet this flop here for sure.

[/ QUOTE ]

For some reason I thought that if I checked the flop and then bet the turn and river then I could get him to fold AQ or worse. Seems like a lot of people would play AK this way. Could also be a bluff of course, but he does not know me as a bluffer (we have only been at the table together a short time).

On the other hand, just betting out on the flop is more threatening because of the potential for more betting. I can see how that should be the default and checking the occasional exception. I will check the smaller stakes forums to see what kind of math has been worked out here. Seems like a pretty common spot and I probably shouldn't have wasted peoples' time here.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-29-2007, 04:57 PM
DLizzle DLizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,387
Default Re: 10/25 NL live I am bad at 3-betting

[ QUOTE ]
if you did decide to ch flop and bet turn like you did, you should overbet the river

[/ QUOTE ]

agree, he is prob gonna call a normal size bet
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-29-2007, 06:10 PM
AAismyfriend AAismyfriend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Valuestacking myself
Posts: 2,907
Default Re: 10/25 NL live I am bad at 3-betting

[ QUOTE ]
if you did decide to ch flop and bet turn like you did, you should overbet the river

[/ QUOTE ]

yessir
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.