I folded a set for 100bb's - Page 2

Al_Money · #11 11-23-2007, 02:29 AM

alright I give up. I thought it was close but apparently not.

Keyser. · #12 11-23-2007, 02:30 AM

yeah but a ton of TAGs at 200nl really really suck and can't fold a nut draw for 100bbs, and never would consider folding 45ss or something either.

Just think of it as you are putting him on the what... 3 combinations of 66? that range is just never ever correct. this fold is actually very bad tbh

loosbastard · #13 11-23-2007, 02:32 AM

Board: 2h Ks 6s

Hand 0: 56.919% { 2d2s }
Hand 1: 43.081% { 66, AsQs, AsJs, AsTs, KsQs, QsJs, JsTs, Ts9s, 9s8s, 8s7s, 5s4s }

Cawl.

************

And even if you make his range tighter and take away some of the FD's:

Board: 2h Ks 6s

Hand 0: 48.611% { 2d2s }
Hand 1: 51.389% { 66, AsQs, AsJs, JsTs, Ts9s, 5s4s}

Still a call.

Al_Money · #14 11-23-2007, 02:33 AM

I think its closer than you guys think it is but I'm not going to change your minds. I think its mostly me giving the tag too much credit but w/e.

How do you play it with 150bbs? 200?

ikestoys · #15 11-23-2007, 02:41 AM

kljdbsaflkwjfha;iosfhdas;odifhasfkas;klfhjasd;

fold pre

Al_Money · #16 11-23-2007, 02:44 AM

ok ikestoys, it was a bad fold. I get it. Thanks.

nath · #17 11-23-2007, 03:20 AM

About 18 months ago I posted a hand where I folded a set for 100 BB. People thought I was retarded then, even though I turned out to be right in the end (not just results but villain as I read him was massively weighed to a better hand).

Anyway, your fold is retarded.

nath · #18 11-23-2007, 03:23 AM

Post deleted by nath

nath · #19 11-23-2007, 03:24 AM

Also while it's on my mind: nice avatar Ike. You can't have Coach Lesticles.

MichaelBolton777 · #20 11-23-2007, 03:26 AM

[ QUOTE ]
kljdbsaflkwjfha;iosfhdas;odifhasfkas;klfhjasd;

fold pre

[/ QUOTE ]

anyone else folding this preflop? i watched a stox vid that recommended opening any pair from any position in 6 max. what is a good default for NL 200?