|
|
#61
09-29-2007, 03:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Your method doesn\'t take into account postflop play
yes, I play 1-2 at stars....so maybe I don't have as big a leak as I thought?
|
|
#62
09-29-2007, 03:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Your method doesn\'t take into account postflop play
[ QUOTE ]
yes, I play 1-2 at stars....so maybe I don't have as big a leak as I thought? [/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't read anything into it on its own. Though that doesn't prevent you from digging deeper into your play with pairs. Any excuse to get better is a good one as far as I'm concerned.
|
|
#64
09-29-2007, 08:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How to tell if you are running good or bad (Revised v2)
[ QUOTE ]
can you help me out here? Am I just running horribly? (I hope so : )) I'm running at like .73 bb / 100 over 15855 hands at 5/10. ( not a big sample) So WITHOUT the showonlyhandsthatwerenotfolded checked, my stats are as follows one pair 38.8% 6533 times two pair 52.55% 2600 times three 72.48% 599 times straight 75.19% 482 times flush 83.65% 315 times full house 90.70% 248 times If you have aim or something and would be able to help me out with some of my stats, that would be awesome. thanks again. [/ QUOTE ] You quote your win rate per hundred and wonder whether you are doing horribly. What do you believe the mean win rate should be for a person of your ability at 5/10? This is just about the toughest of all levels in terms of rake + opponent skill.
|
|
#66
09-30-2007, 05:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How to tell if you are running good or bad (Revised v2)
[ QUOTE ]
emerson, the post you're replying to was written 2 years ago... [/ QUOTE ] That's funny. I didn't read the date. I guess two years ago we'd expect much higher win rates.
|
|
#67
10-05-2007, 09:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How to tell if you are running good or bad (Revised v2)
/edited: dumb posting, wrong forum. sorry
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
