Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Sports Betting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 11-30-2007, 01:17 AM
x2ski x2ski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: You agitatin\' my dots?
Posts: 1,918
Default Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/29/07 NFL Thursday GAME THREAD (GB @ DAL)***

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
is Milwaukee the only place that is getting this game on ABC? I thought I heard it's only on satellite even in the rest of Wisconsin (maybe not GReenbay though).

Benny

[/ QUOTE ]

milw, green bay and dallas. thats it.

[/ QUOTE ]

We had it in Appleton too (30 min south of GB), and in HD, which was surprising. I thought we'd have some po-dunk local feed, as opposed to the NFL Network feed.

I'm gonna say good game overall. Although I'm disappointed with the loss, I'm not irate, which I usually would be.

I realize that this is the Sports Betting forum, and "gg overall" doesn't mean [censored], but I lurked the forum today while considering making a first-time sports bet (decided against it), and checked in post-game to see what others had to say.

After lurking, sports-betting seems harder than poker, so I'll catch you guys later.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 11-30-2007, 01:19 AM
RikkiDee RikkiDee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: spite calling on the bubble
Posts: 1,042
Default Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/29/07 NFL Thursday GAME THREAD (GB @ DAL)***

[ QUOTE ]
count me in as a stubborn non-believer of Farve and the pack.

Dal -6.5, 2u

[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

on espn.com they have a basic poll asking who will win this game. I was shocked to see that they had 55% of the country thinking GB would win outright.

Dallas -6.5 baby


[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

as bsp as this sounds, farve is due for a downswing

[/ QUOTE ]

man i'm tired of being right...

pack was lucky to be in this game. Luckbox 60 yard run, and luckbox that Farve got injured because he was destined for a 10/35, 98 yard, 4 int performance
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 11-30-2007, 01:52 AM
fmlycar fmlycar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48
Default Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/29/07 NFL Thursday GAME THREAD (GB @ DAL)***

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

btw go pack -7

[/ QUOTE ]

You need to lineshop better.

[/ QUOTE ]

haha yea i guess i could have got them at -6.5 lol

my bad
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 11-30-2007, 02:15 AM
Nonfiction Nonfiction is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,916
Default Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/29/07 NFL Thursday GAME THREAD (GB @ DAL)***

[ QUOTE ]
donk teaser of Packers +13 and o45 for a unit.

[/ QUOTE ]
ship ship imo
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 11-30-2007, 02:47 AM
Benny Foldem Benny Foldem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Brew Town, WI
Posts: 142
Default Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/29/07 NFL Thursday GAME THREAD (GB @ DAL)***

so much for my 100 bucks...

cheesehead 4 life
benny
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 11-30-2007, 03:49 AM
sethseth sethseth is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 13
Default Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/29/07 NFL Thursday GAME THREAD (GB @ DAL)***

I loaded up on Dallas -3 -125 second half and I think this was wildly +ev. It was so obvious after the first half that
a) Dallas pass rush was ruining GB and nearly sacking the QB half the time
b) Kampman and GB's defensive line were not bringing pressure
c) TO was thrashing Harris
I did not predict any of these pregame, but I am happy that I recognized the value at halftime. I think Dallas covers this line about 2/3 of the time second half. hell if TO does anything but lateral the ball to GB, the bet doesn't lose, and I think GB was lucky to string together that one TD drive in the 2nd. plays that +ev don't come around that often, I'll bet more units next time.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 11-30-2007, 04:32 PM
Lori Lori is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In cyberspace, no-one can hear your sig.
Posts: 6,284
Default Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/29/07 NFL Thursday GAME THREAD (GB @ DAL)***

Be very wary about games changing at halftime. Teams have time to re-evaluate things, the team in front tends to worry more about killing time than scoring points in the 4Q, that kind of thing. It's not just a case of "Zomg they're winning by 20 and they're +3".

I'm not going to go as far as to say you're doing it wrong, just be sure that you consider how team tactics will change as well as the things you mentioned in this one.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.