|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What Price was it? | |||
| $1-$30 |
   
|
24 | 36.36% |
| $30-$60 |
  
|
26 | 39.39% |
| $60+ |
  
|
16 | 24.24% |
| Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
08-22-2007, 02:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which of these two MLB teams would you you take?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] SS: Reyes >> Ramirez, B 3B: Rodriguez >> Cabrera, A 2B: Roberts > Polanco, A 1B: Pujols > Morneau, B LF: Holliday > Ramirez, B CF: Suzuki >>> Granderson, B RF: Guerrero >> Ordonez, B C: Posada > Varitek, B /thread [/ QUOTE ] I love when people make posts that are incredibly wrong and say /thread afterwards. [/ QUOTE ] what exactly is incredibly wrong about my assesment? probably I exaggerated, rodriguez is only > cabrera, not >>, and same goes with reyes vs. ramirez, but the rest are accurate [/ QUOTE ] lol HRam is miles better than Reyes at SS. 
|
|
#12
08-22-2007, 02:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which of these two MLB teams would you you take?
i personally think hanley's offensive productions are wonky... sure he hits way more HR than reyes, but hanley's a leadoff hitter, HR are such a meaningless statistic to compare the two at.
between the two, i think it comes down to reyes' far superior defensive ability and his better baserunning, vs. hanley's better BA... and since this is about overall team vs. team, i'd take reyes. same kind of thing goes for suzuki... he still hits for a far better avg than CG, swipes way more bags, and has a great arm from the outfield vs. cg's fielding ability... i go with suzuki imo
|
|
#13
08-22-2007, 02:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which of these two MLB teams would you you take?
[ QUOTE ]
sure he hits way more HR than reyes, but hanley's a leadoff hitter, HR are such a meaningless statistic to compare the two at. [/ QUOTE ] /thread
|
|
#14
08-22-2007, 02:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which of these two MLB teams would you you take?
[ QUOTE ]
i personally think hanley's offensive productions are wonky... sure he hits way more HR than reyes, but hanley's a leadoff hitter, HR are such a meaningless statistic to compare the two at. [/ QUOTE ] this is true, i heard on NESN that HRs can be a real rally killer
|
|
#15
08-22-2007, 02:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which of these two MLB teams would you you take?
[ QUOTE ]
i personally think hanley's offensive productions are wonky... sure he hits way more HR than reyes, but hanley's a leadoff hitter, HR are such a meaningless statistic to compare the two at. between the two, i think it comes down to reyes' far superior defensive ability and his better baserunning, vs. hanley's better BA... and since this is about overall team vs. team, i'd take reyes. same kind of thing goes for suzuki... he still hits for a far better avg than CG, swipes way more bags, and has a great arm from the outfield vs. cg's fielding ability... i go with suzuki imo [/ QUOTE ] POTY!
|
|
#16
08-22-2007, 02:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which of these two MLB teams would you you take?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] sure he hits way more HR than reyes, but hanley's a leadoff hitter, HR are such a meaningless statistic to compare the two at. [/ QUOTE ] /thread [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I hate it when my leadoff guy hits a solo home run. I much prefer my 5 hitter to hit a solo home run.
|
|
#17
08-22-2007, 02:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which of these two MLB teams would you you take?
zomg i am still grappling with how amazing this statement is.
sure he hits way more HR than reyes, but hanley's a leadoff hitter, HR are such a meaningless statistic to compare the two at. i just can't even begin to get over it
|
|
#18
08-22-2007, 02:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which of these two MLB teams would you you take?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i personally think hanley's offensive productions are wonky... sure he hits way more HR than reyes, but hanley's a leadoff hitter, HR are such a meaningless statistic to compare the two at. [/ QUOTE ] this is true, i heard on NESN that HRs can be a real rally killer [/ QUOTE ] yeah, but since Hanley's a LEADOFF HITTER, his HRs don't kill nearly as many rallies as Reyes' HRs do.
|
|
#19
08-22-2007, 02:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which of these two MLB teams would you you take?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i personally think hanley's offensive productions are wonky... sure he hits way more HR than reyes, but hanley's a leadoff hitter, HR are such a meaningless statistic to compare the two at. [/ QUOTE ] this is true, i heard on NESN that HRs can be a real rally killer [/ QUOTE ] You got leadoff hitters killing rallies with homers, and you got fat cleanup hitters clogging the bases, what kinda team is this?!?! How am I supposed to call for a bunt?
|
|
#20
08-22-2007, 02:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which of these two MLB teams would you you take?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i personally think hanley's offensive productions are wonky... sure he hits way more HR than reyes, but hanley's a leadoff hitter, HR are such a meaningless statistic to compare the two at. [/ QUOTE ] this is true, i heard on NESN that HRs can be a real rally killer [/ QUOTE ] yeah, but since Hanley's a LEADOFF HITTER, his HRs don't kill nearly as many rallies as Reyes' HRs do. [/ QUOTE ] can't start a rally if it's already been kilt amirite?
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
