Ok....I'm confused now...

[maverickai]

grunching.

From villian's line, he seems to be holding, a top Q split pair, strong kicker. or 44. TT's not likely, as I doubt he'll cap the flop with TT. What is his usual style on the turn, does he 3bet with top pair, top kicker? If this level of aggression by him is extraordinary, then he could be holding the dreaded QQ. I would deem him to have very little chance of holding a KJ, he won't have capped your aggression on the flop.

[Bulletproof Monk]

5bet the flop

4bet the turn

2bet the river

[Bulletproof Monk]

btw i think i probably go ~7 bets on this turn

[Sushiglutton]

His range is still pretty much 44 on the turn so I cap it.

[Bulletproof Monk]

clarification here... is there a cap? because before you posted crown hands which have no cap, but in the op you use the word 'cap' when vil 4bets the flop

[knockonwood]

Yep, I mean 4 bet is a cap for the sake of posters who mostly play online with a 4bet structure.

[KitCloudkicker]

go infinity bets on the turn.

serious response: cap all streets unless a Q, T, or 4 comes.

[Dr. Matt]

only hand you fear is QQ and I don't doubt he has it, but I'd also think 44, AA, KK. I think live this is how I'd play it.

[Dr. Matt]

in order for dude to have 2 pair he'd have to have Q4, Q7, 74 which are some seriously [censored] cards to cold-call the raise from SB. My range for dude would be AA, KK, QQ, 44.

Flop/turn AA(6), KK(6), QQ(3), 44(3) = 15 win, 3 lose
river AA(3), KK(6), QQ(3), 44(3) = 12 win, 6 lose

So yea, I'd cap the turn and call the river.

[tehox]

*grunch*

Put more bets in. Does SB really not three bet preflop with QQ?