KQs

bhudson · #1 08-05-2007, 04:05 PM

IMHO, betting the turn or checking behind for pot control should depend on the aquatic nature of the villain than the board, if the villain is not unknown.

Unknown Soldier · #2 08-05-2007, 04:06 PM

[ QUOTE ]
IMHO, betting the turn or checking behind for pot control should depend on the aquatic nature of the villain than the board, if the villain is not unknown.

[/ QUOTE ]

waaa?

easy turn bet, get 3 streets here please

djj6835 · #3 08-06-2007, 01:52 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
IMHO, betting the turn or checking behind for pot control should depend on the aquatic nature of the villain than the board, if the villain is not unknown.

[/ QUOTE ] waaa?

easy turn bet, get 3 streets here please

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he means....
"should depend more on how fishy the opponent is than how wet the board is."

Bulletproof Monk · #4 08-06-2007, 02:06 AM

rofl

well ive heard aquaman is quite a good player, perhaps he was referring to that?

anyway

/end hijack

early325 · #5 08-06-2007, 06:01 AM

i cant stop laughing at "aquatic nature"

Bulletproof Monk · #6 08-06-2007, 01:34 AM

[ QUOTE ]
IMHO, betting the turn or checking behind for pot control should depend on the aquatic nature of the villain than the board, if the villain is not unknown.

[/ QUOTE ]

i get the feeling villain is very aquatic here, just by the stats i mean...