|
|
|
|
#1
10-14-2007, 04:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
I hate these situations too. For people saying fold how high would the pair have to be for us to shove? What about raise?
|
|
#2
10-14-2007, 04:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
snap fold. and I don't think it's an unexploitable shove at all, unless my instincts are wildly off on this one. you guys sure you did it with a bunch of diff call ranges?
|
|
#3
10-14-2007, 04:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
[ QUOTE ]
snap fold. and I don't think it's an unexploitable shove at all, unless my instincts are wildly off on this one. you guys sure you did it with a bunch of diff call ranges? [/ QUOTE ] i havn't done any calcs or anything so i dunno if it's unexploitable, but it doesn't need to be unexploitable to be +ev.
|
|
#4
10-14-2007, 04:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
[ QUOTE ]
snap fold. and I don't think it's an unexploitable shove at all, unless my instincts are wildly off on this one. you guys sure you did it with a bunch of diff call ranges? [/ QUOTE ] Played with calling ranges for remaining 4 from 10% --> 100%, I think min +EV was 0.5%. Argh, [censored] me. Had BB set wrong. No, it's not unexploitable.
|
|
#5
10-14-2007, 05:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100 FO - Pretty Basic Spot That Confuses Me
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] snap fold. and I don't think it's an unexploitable shove at all, unless my instincts are wildly off on this one. you guys sure you did it with a bunch of diff call ranges? [/ QUOTE ] Played with calling ranges for remaining 4 from 10% --> 100%, I think min +EV was 0.5%. Argh, [censored] me. Had BB set wrong. No, it's not unexploitable. [/ QUOTE ] I just ran some numbers with SNGPT, shoving is either very slightly -cEV or very slightly +cEV throughout some reasonable calling ranges, it's extremely marginal.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
