|
|
#21
10-05-2007, 07:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Strat Question: pf raise sizing w/ premium hands in EP
Good stuff Albert. I keep re-reading PNLHV1, but still struggle to get my head round how target SPRs fit into nitty tight full ring games.
As br.bm says, I am not sure that we are trying to play monster pots with our big pairs. This is because we are only going to get a low SPR vs. typical opponents if they happen to have a slightly lower monster i.e. AA vs KK. Even when a player 3bets light, they will still typically get away from their hand without going bust, as they won't expect us to call/raise with anything other than what we have - a monster pair. What we want with AA, KK, QQ, AK is to win a medium pot UI, and to stack someone if we improve beyond 1 pair. Attempting to play for stacks when you hold AA UI is a losing play IMO, vs standard (nitty) FR players. Of course, this is not the case if we can get a massive donator to call - but how many of these are there in NL100/NL200? So, what SPR should we be targetting if our initial aim is to win a medium sized pot? Does it change? I guess that 13 is still bad, as it allows villains to put us in tricky spots post flop (they don't know that we are initially aiming for half a stack). As I say, I am still struggling with this! 
|
|
#22
10-05-2007, 08:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Strat Question: pf raise sizing w/ premium hands in EP
[ QUOTE ]
Good stuff Albert. I keep re-reading PNLHV1, but still struggle to get my head round how target SPRs fit into nitty tight full ring games. [/ QUOTE ] in nitty tight full ring games, you plan most of your hands around stealing or playing small pots, not planning for commitment. sorry, but as i have said before, we mildly [censored] up the split between volume 1 and 2. you should not plan all hands around commitment, especially in nitty games. you should still remain very aware of SPRs.
|
|
#24
10-05-2007, 08:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Strat Question: pf raise sizing w/ premium hands in EP
[ QUOTE ]
The "bet pot" button is my best friend [/ QUOTE ] I'll admit I haven't read anything in this thread yet, but is it really any more complicated than this? I mean really, is it?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
