Sbrugby on 300-600 NL.

Mr. Bill Clinton · #1 08-12-2007, 11:43 PM

[ QUOTE ]
this is so dumb. its glorified coinflipping and rugby hit the jackpot. only he was just as naive and starstruck as all you railbirds and thought he had the skill and edge. oh well, keep the dream alive. keep denying its been fckn bingo all along.

[/ QUOTE ]
From the same OP that brought us the pole

Victor · #2 08-12-2007, 11:49 PM

and ive also made thousands of posts far better than your best. and, incidentally, my concerns are constantly argued currently re the whole bot fiasco. but hey, it aint my fault if simple mind cant interpret. i shouldnt even respond but, well, bison explained it once.

paulcouto · #3 08-12-2007, 11:53 PM

[ QUOTE ]
and ive also made thousands of posts far better than your best. and, incidentally, my concerns are constantly argued currently re the whole bot fiasco. but hey, it aint my fault if simple mind cant interpret. i shouldnt even respond but, well, bison explained it once.

[/ QUOTE ]

be careful victor, they might really take this personal and start digging deeper into previous posts.

john voight · #4 08-13-2007, 12:00 AM

I think brian is playing under rolled. Losing 250k in a day, or 1mill in a month shouldn't be a big deal. Well, he is down more than that, and he is still playing 3/6. Maybe he should play these guys at 2/4 or even 1/2, get his confidence back, get over the hump, build up his BR, and move back up.

Why do I think he is hurting? B/c he makes posts in his blog about it; if it was nothing (like a 10% loss of BR), he wouldn't post, but OBV it is significant to him.

paulcouto · #5 08-13-2007, 12:45 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I think brian is playing under rolled. Losing 250k in a day, or 1mill in a month shouldn't be a big deal. Well, he is down more than that, and he is still playing 3/6. Maybe he should play these guys at 2/4 or even 1/2, get his confidence back, get over the hump, build up his BR, and move back up.

Why do I think he is hurting? B/c he makes posts in his blog about it; if it was nothing (like a 10% loss of BR), he wouldn't post, but OBV it is significant to him.

[/ QUOTE ]

well said, but confidence cant influence the cards. brian had time to reflect and come back fresh and ready and he's still getting tortured.

Jiganti · #6 08-13-2007, 12:03 AM

XxGeneralxX · #7 08-13-2007, 12:04 AM

[ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

just looking at that gives me the creeps

Sodom · #8 08-13-2007, 06:28 AM

[ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]
What bankroll do you need to play 300-600 when one of the supposed best player obviously can have a downswing of 1 500 000 USD in about 4300 hands? Is 20 000 000 USD big enough?

Maybe some of the un-known players who play Brian actually have much bigger bankroll than that? I don't know, but they should have. There are some players who have been winners in the highest live games for decades and I would be a bit surprised if this quite loaded players with a lot of experience in terms of variance, would not try to grab Brian's money. The history of how easy Bobby Baldwin caught Brian bluffing at Bellagio was maybe significant.

I doubt that any “online” pro are loaded enough for this game no matter how good they are because of the big variance.

Shizzle12345 · #9 08-13-2007, 06:34 AM

sodom what ur saying makes no sense, GL at trying to get 90k hands live in... you play waaay waaay more hands online, and you have way more variance (since more hands). Live players are usually more fishy, and more players with lots of money losing it because they can.

isapistola · #10 08-13-2007, 07:53 AM

when brian wins hes the best player in the world.
when brian loses hes on a downswing.

25 buy-ins in under 5k hands is sick no matter what the stakes are. sodom brought up a great point. with the nosebleed games being incredibly aggressive (stacking off lightly with top/mid pair, flush/straight draw on the turn etc.) i dont think any traditional bankroll management rules apply to these games.