#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sbrugby is so silly
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] while he should prob take a break from PLO for a few days, the swings at the 200/400 level are absurd, the games run deep and often will have 400bb+ pots where its 55/45 60/40 run bad in those and it takes a while to recover [/ QUOTE ] that's the thing, he isn't bankrolled for 200-400 PLO shorthanded and HU. Practically no one in those games is. Aba had like 1.4M on FTP a month ago in a CR video? Playing 200-400 PLO with that little dollars is [censored] crazy. I had under $1m on FTP when I took shots playing 200-400 HU and 6 max NLHE and I thought I was taking a huge risk, even though I planned to quit if I lost a few buy-ins. 200-400 HU PLO is way way more variance and a much bigger game than NLHE. The whole "20 buy-ins, take a shot, rinse and repeat" thing is so absurd, I can't see that being a good idea no matter how good you are at poker... -Jeff [/ QUOTE ] kelly criteria disagrees w/ you |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sbrugby is so silly
[ QUOTE ]
Aba had like 1.4M on FTP a month ago in a CR video? [/ QUOTE ] you know that's not all his money right? ps i guess aba doesn't know the c/r all in on the river=nuts or close to it theorem. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sbrugby is so silly
[ QUOTE ]
i guess aba doesn't know the c/r all in on the river=nuts or close to it theorem. [/ QUOTE ] prob a good theorem for 1/2 and lower, but at the highstakes games its not worth much |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: sbrugby is so silly
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i guess aba doesn't know the c/r all in on the river=nuts or close to it theorem. [/ QUOTE ] prob a good theorem for 3/6 and lower, but at the highstakes games its not worth much [/ QUOTE ] fyp |
|
|