Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-02-2007, 08:13 AM
Bulletproof Monk Bulletproof Monk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: THREE OH SIX AM
Posts: 3,893
Default Re: .5/1 A8 BB defense

3bet preflop and lead flop

as played c/c flop

as played i guess turn and river are fine but you put yourself in a sick spot by that terrible flop play
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-02-2007, 05:03 PM
Harv72b Harv72b is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 6,830
Default Re: .5/1 A8 BB defense

[ QUOTE ]
- worse hands. No pair no draw. These will either fold right now or call the c/r and fold turn. Sometimes they will 3-bet but thats a rare occasion. Seems to me that you FR live guys expect this to be 3-bet quite a lot with worse hands. That rarely happens to me when I play SH online.

[/ QUOTE ]

I never play live, and I've logged a fair number of hands in 6max & shorter online over the years. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] For the exact reasons you mentioned, I love a call/call/call line here, when we have position. Out of position, you're making a pretty significant mistake when you allow him the option of drawing to a 1 pair hand cheaply (or for free).

I think that a lot of the value you're attaching to just check/calling comes from the assumption that the majority of opponents will fire 3 barrels in this scenario, which simply isn't true. It especially isn't true when he has a decent hand which he believes may be good at showdown UI, such as a weaker ace or K high, or when he's holding a weak draw (such as a gutshot) and decides to take his free card on the turn. You also assume that these hands will not look us up after we check/raise the flop, which is equally untrue.

When I say that we might get him to fold better hands, I don't mean a pair (unless maybe the board gets mega-ugly & we keep firing). I'm talking about something like AT or AJ when the turn bricks as well. Now that's a very small part of his range & he won't always fold them at any point (agree completely that AK is looking us up almost always), but we're primarily check/raising both for value and to protect our hand--if he folds a perfectly good 6-outer immediately or to our turn follow-up, I'm okay with that. Particularly given that I don't believe he's 3-barrelling nearly as often as you appear to be suggesting.

In a heads up match, I can see just check/calling down from time to time here (and check/raising from time to time, and donking the flop from time to time). This isn't a heads up match--it's a heads up hand played on a full ring table that's gone 4-handed. Given those circumstances, it's bad poker to assume that our opponent is comfortable playing the kind of hyperaggressive style that HU or short-handed online play requires.

You are also absolutely failing to recognize the metagame advantages which fastplaying a hand like ace high can have here. If you come into a heads up match against me check/calling down every time you have a marginal hand, well...I'm gonna crush you, at least given anything close to neutral luck with the cards. It becomes so much easier for your opponents to play perfect poker against you when you so obviously declare your hands like that; or would you be playing 98 the same way here? In that case, you're leaving money on the table by not extracting value from your made hands.

Anyway....worse hands. Worse aces are calling the check/raise (or 3betting) every single time. Two overcards, which makes up a pretty significant portion of his range, are also calling (or 3betting) every single time. Any other draw, such as a gutshot or even runner runner draw, is going to at least call the flop check/raise pretty much always. Hell, even a total crap hand which completely missed the flop will call our check/raise fairly often just for form's sake. Really, the only hands we run the risk of losing immediately by doing this are absolute junk hands which will more often than not give up on the turn UI anyway; I don't think you're going to see 52o 3barrel this too often, or at the least, I think you're going to see hands which might peel to the river against an aggressive line (like JT, KQ, A4, etc) check through the turn and/or river more often than you'll see a total junk hand fire at the pot 3 times.

Also tl;dr, but most of my posts are. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-02-2007, 05:28 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 8,076
Default Re: .5/1 A8 BB defense

Okay, I didn't read the debate very carefully, but here are some thoughts to throw out there:

1) Calling preflop and check-raising the flop is equally as expensive as 3-betting preflop and leading the flop. Both lines are valid and the strength of each line depends on the villain in question.

2) The read "Button loves to steal and always c-bets." doesn't tell you a whole lot about how to proceed in this hand past the flop unless you interpret this to mean he will c-bet the turn and river UI as well.

3) Getting villain to fold better A-high hands and Kx that didn't pair up before seeing the river has value as well. In a semi-biggish pot, making him fold the best hand or a 6-outer is a good thing, unless he will c-bet the turn and river UI as well. This clause is very important and you should watch for this type of aggression.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-02-2007, 11:03 PM
vixticator vixticator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,639
Default Re: .5/1 A8 BB defense

[ QUOTE ]
I asked OP which hands he thought villain would continue betting on the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]Sorry, yes his entire range after the flop. I never see people 3bet and check behind for showdown. Let me correct this real fast. His entire 3betting flop range, not preflop range obv.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-02-2007, 11:31 PM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: .5/1 A8 BB defense

Harv

First off. Sorry for assuming you were a live player. My bad!

Anyhoo.

It looks like we basically agree here, but just disagree on the right decision to choose in order to prevent him in owning us with his position.

A few points

- If you are scared he will take free cards you dont have to c/r to prevent them. C/c flop donk turn then. The thing is. People will 2nd barrel so often.

- I completely agree that Ax might be calling down and better Ax might be folding. These are the only hands I would c/r if I could see his cards.

- Metagayme smetagayme. Its a random donk at 0.5/1. Completely agree with your points tho.

- Your post completely focus on the good things from c/r'ing. It is still a bit unclear to me whether you want to see a SD if he 3-bets. But given you assume he will 3-bet with worse hands sometimes I am guessing you are seeing a SD on two bricks. Do I have to point out how much this will have you valueowned by better hands?

- Against a predictable player who 2nd barrels this is such an easy c/c c/c c/f or c/c c/c c/c IMO. C/r'ing will just set you up for ownage when you either fold the best hand in a bloatet pot or call down light as a dog because the pot is huge.

In stead of bloating the pot by c/r'ing in order to fight the positional disadvantage I liek just keeping the pot small to induce my opponent to make mistakes with his worse hands later on the big streets.

Not that I dont like call preflop c/r flop lines with good Ax. I just think you should save them for the 244 flops or 238 flops or whatever. In which case I will gladly c/r flop and bet down for value
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.