Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:11 PM
Insistent_ Insistent_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 233
Default Rake consideration

I am playing 4-6 handed with an aggressive semi-loose style of play.
Per hour - how much in $$ would I pay in rake APPROXIMATELY at:
1/2 NL?
2/4 NL?
3/6 NL?
5/10 NL?

Just give some numbers if you have a good idea. Standard rake levels for the industry....

And more to the point - at what level would you think it would be a wise idea not to think too much about rakeback but just table selection? For example... I am a one table:er myself and me strength is reading and playing specific opponents and I am thinking about playing a 2/4 game with 0% rakeback despite the fact that I have 50% on another site - just because it seems juicier. Do you think I am out of line with this type of reasoning?

At what level will the rake start to become low compared to the blind?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:25 PM
rand rand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 1,021
Default Re: Rake consideration

if you are only playing one table the rake is pretty much irrelevant imo

im not at home so i dont have pt but i got like 1k-1.5k 12 tabling 1,2 and i get about the same 8 tabling 2,4 now if that helps any
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:33 PM
Insistent_ Insistent_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 233
Default Re: Rake consideration

I am typically playing 1 and sometimes 2 6-max tables and also some heads up.

My limit now is $1.5/3. I am very picky with rake back deals but I am starting to wonder - maybe correctly - if I should just see 25/50/75% as the same - a little extra money if you happen to play there.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:37 PM
rand rand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 1,021
Default Re: Rake consideration

its not the same, and while percentages are the same for someone who plays 1-2 tables vs someone who plays 8+ the real money seems almost irrelevant to me doing 1-2 unless you play ALOT of hands

i would just game select...but you could prolly figure this out pretty easily using PT and some basic math
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:42 PM
Insistent_ Insistent_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 233
Default Re: Rake consideration

I was born lazy. :\
Optimal would be someone with experience in the same type of situation.
I also dont really get the logic that plaing "ALOT" of hand would mean that rakeback is more importnat. Winrate/100hands and rake rate should be all that matters?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:48 PM
rand rand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 1,021
Default Re: Rake consideration

thats why i said the percentages are the same but realistically i wouldnt care about my rake back if i put in the same number of hours i do now but only played 1-2 tables...it would be an insignificant amount of money
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:58 PM
centgas centgas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 621
Default Re: Rake consideration

I have found that 200nl at PP is about $0.1 a hand in rake. Can anyone here post how much they pay at 400 and 600nl please...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.