#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky is wrong
Most likely a site that doesn't save mucked showdown hands, hence the title.
20K in 50,000 hands is a brag though. You could be fgators. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky is wrong
[ QUOTE ]
You run ridiculously good. [/ QUOTE ] [] skills to read ev-graphs |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky is wrong
Tip of the day:
I have won w/o showdown $169,260 I have lost in showdown $147,761 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky is wrong
[x] site without mucked cards
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky is wrong
I suspect my cash graph is similar, but with the green line below 0 [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky is wrong
[ QUOTE ]
[x] site without mucked cards [/ QUOTE ] I'm interested to hear more about this, because I don't actually know if this is right or wrong. This is from a site that gives both hero's and opponent's hands in the hand history, if the hand has gone to showdown. Also, PT indicates the same winnings as this graph. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky is wrong
I'm pretty sure I've played against this guy. Every single day.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky is wrong
[ QUOTE ]
[] skills to read ev-graphs [/ QUOTE ] [ ] Understands EV graph [x] Mocks somebody who does understand EV graph |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky is wrong
[ QUOTE ]
Most likely a site that doesn't save mucked showdown hands, hence the title. [/ QUOTE ] Thank you. My graph looks very similar but I play bodog and they don't show mucked hands. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky is wrong
If you and Fgators put your head together, you might produce a winning style.
|
|
|