Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > High Stakes MTT
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-16-2007, 06:41 PM
HelixTrix HelixTrix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 82
Default What stack size is it best to cold-call with?

Having played a lot of 6 max cash games I've developed an aversion to cold-calling when the opener is in fairly late position. But in tournaments I find myself in some awkward spots due to the stack sizes.

For example, with an M of 22 (33 BBs) you pick up 99 on the button and the hijack opens for 3 BBs. If you rr to 9 BBs and he shoves, your odds are 2.17 to 1 and you probably have to fold. However, your hand is probably ahead of his range and after cold-calling you often have to fold the best hand when a couple of overcards come. Do you prefer to reraise when you are committed to calling a shove, or when you can get away from it?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2007, 02:19 AM
mikeJ mikeJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Back to Berkeley
Posts: 2,065
Default Re: What stack size is it best to cold-call with?

Don't use M, it's a concept that basically has no use. In the situation you mentioned, I am coldcalling often in that 30 bbs+ range. If I am reraising, usually it's a value reraise where I think he's willing to get it in w/ worse than 99.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2007, 09:38 PM
Mench Mench is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Strong Island
Posts: 1,861
Default Re: What stack size is it best to cold-call with?

i flat here with 30bbs like always.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.