More profit- Stars or Full Tilt?

[pokerjunky]

Right now I average around $1,000 in rakeback for every 20,000 hands at Full Tilt. This is about 1 month's worth of play. Is there any way to come close to this much cash back thru Poker Stars VPP program in this time span?

Only reason I ask is because I run like anus at FTP and am trying to find a reason to go back to Stars where I seem to have better luck.

[freecard4all]

yes if you are able to reach supernova (it's even more I think but depends if you play 6 or 9max)

[ShipDaSherb]

Supernova is a higher rakeback percentage, but the games at Stars are nittier so the MGR ends up being less. I played a lot of hands at both Stars and FTP 100nl this month, and the rakeback amount ended up being about 0.9 BB/100 at both. That was including the value of FTP points and ironman in the calculations vs. Supernova (valuing each FPP at 1.5 cents). My winrate from playing was significantly higher on FTP due to the looser games.

MGR per 100 hands:
PS $5.22
FTP $5.99

Saw-Flop Percentage:
PS 18.36%
FTP 23.53%

Avg. Pot Size:
PS 17.67
FTP 19.65

[Mattby]

If Im going to play 6 to 8 tables at nl25 full ring witch is better for me? Lets say I play 2 hours a day. What about nl50 full ring?