|
|
#32
10-26-2007, 02:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
The pats caught more TD's last week than the skins receivers have all year. Didn't Moss bench himself?
Yes they have a decent defense, but Arizona and their 1 armed QB put up like 300 yards on them. I watch almost every game, excpet when it's a pathetic team like the raiders. 
|
|
#34
10-26-2007, 02:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] they had dallas beat up until the final second, and they just beat baltimore fwiw. [/ QUOTE ] LoL could you say anything more square? [/ QUOTE ] If not for awful offensive play calling, they would have beat dallas. Without Lossman in there they are a better team, and should stick it to the jets.
|
|
#35
10-26-2007, 02:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
lol thats not saying much our receivers dont have a td yet this year
|
|
#37
10-26-2007, 02:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
i'd pound washington -17 but w/e. for all this talk about the patriots covering every game, the browns game was a backdoor cover, and washington actually has a defense.
|
|
#38
10-26-2007, 02:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
I'll book your washington -17, for however much you want.
The browns have a decent team this year, and still have a chance of winning their division if Pitt stumbles. Yes they were lucky to cover that game.
|
|
#39
10-26-2007, 02:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BBV: Betting the NFL
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
