|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Eric Seidel\'s AQ vs. Brat\'s KK (PAD)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I have a proposition. Let's refer to Phil Hellmuth as Phil Hellmuth rather than "Brat." [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] its still retarded |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Eric Seidel\'s AQ vs. Brat\'s KK (PAD)
[ QUOTE ]
- This one, which was weird. Just as I was rubbing my hands expecting Seidel to take a big chunk out of Hellmuth, he waited till he was beat and then bet. [/ QUOTE ] Eric knows Phil plays primarily premium cards. With no King on the board, there was at least a pretty good chance Phil was holding one. If it's the K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Eric is effed. So, checking to the river, IMO, wasn't a bad play. My guess is that the bet river was a blocking bet to keep Phil from going all-in. In the end, it worked out well for Eric, as he could've lost a lot more in the hand. He doesn't have all those bracelets for nothing. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Eric Seidel\'s AQ vs. Brat\'s KK (PAD)
i think he butchered the hand imo
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Eric Seidel\'s AQ vs. Brat\'s KK (PAD)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] - This one, which was weird. Just as I was rubbing my hands expecting Seidel to take a big chunk out of Hellmuth, he waited till he was beat and then bet. [/ QUOTE ] Eric knows Phil plays primarily premium cards. With no King on the board, there was at least a pretty good chance Phil was holding one. If it's the K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Eric is effed. So, checking to the river, IMO, wasn't a bad play. My guess is that the bet river was a blocking bet to keep Phil from going all-in. In the end, it worked out well for Eric, as he could've lost a lot more in the hand. He doesn't have all those bracelets for nothing. [/ QUOTE ] So you're basicly saying Seidel doesn't bet the flop and the turn because he knows Hellmuth will outdraw him on the river with pretty much exactly the K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]? That's so result oriented and doesn't make sense. |
|
|