#1
|
|||
|
|||
nl400...AKs vs. 4 bet
Villian is Tag...15/13.
Full Tilt Poker, $2/$4 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 7 Players LegoPoker Hand History Converter MP: $94 CO: $648.80 BTN: $779.10 Hero (SB): $398.30 BB: $400 UTG: $470.60 UTG+1: $105.15 Pre-Flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB) UTG calls $4, 3 folds, <font color="red">BTN raises to $18</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $62</font>, 2 folds, <font color="red">BTN raises to $160</font>, <font color="red">Hero ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400...AKs vs. 4 bet
Shove and hope he folds whatever thing he's getting proper odds to call with.
EDIT: Actually, I didn't see that he was isoing a UTG limper. That makes it closer. Everything seems viable here. Idk if I fully believe his four-bet on the button. A lot of people will flat here. What are UTG's numbers if you have any? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400...AKs vs. 4 bet
UTG folded to my 3 bet.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400...AKs vs. 4 bet
No I understand but I'm wondering what UTG's PT numbers are anyway. Because if UTG's like a super donk or weak-tight, this is a standard button open for a TAG which means his range is wide (K9, QT, etc). But if UTG is also a TAG, then BTN's initial raising range shrinks (and hence, his four-bet range, in theory anyway).
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400...AKs vs. 4 bet
any 3 betting history of note?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400...AKs vs. 4 bet
gOOD Point...he was very weak tight...10/2....
What does that say about button raise? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400...AKs vs. 4 bet
BTN's probably pretty solid. UTG is clearly a nit and he limped UTG. Provided BTN's not on autopilot (and even still, it's hard to miss a 10/2), he probably doesn't raise the 10/2 light (unless UTG is so weak that he just constantly call-preflop/folds-to-c-bet). I think his four-bet range here is pretty squarely QQ+, AK and he's not folding. With the money already in the middle, it's still ultra close. I probably muck / note, but I'm pissed as all hell about it.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400...AKs vs. 4 bet
[ QUOTE ]
BTN's probably pretty solid. UTG is clearly a nit and he limped UTG. Provided BTN's not on autopilot (and even still, it's hard to miss a 10/2), he probably doesn't raise the 10/2 light (unless UTG is so weak that he just constantly call-preflop/folds-to-c-bet). I think his four-bet range here is pretty squarely QQ+, AK and he's not folding. With the money already in the middle, it's still ultra close. I probably muck / note, but I'm pissed as all hell about it. [/ QUOTE ] Very insighful analysis! I'll definitelt keep that in perspective! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400...AKs vs. 4 bet
I'd fold it as well.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: nl400...AKs vs. 4 bet
if UTG is a setminer, a TAG on the button could very easily be raising damn near anything playable.
|
|
|