|
|
#53
06-20-2007, 11:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: filthy cleans up
[ QUOTE ]
Call call call. Filthy can easily push here with AQ. [/ QUOTE ] so because it has a chance of being a split pot we should call? agree with the point being made that AQ is probably not in his perception of your range - one wonders what his range is, though. i'm also not sure a flush raises here. i also like aejones's call and berate line - one i took myself quite a bit 
|
|
#55
06-20-2007, 11:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: filthy cleans up
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i also like aejones's call and berate line - one i took myself quite a bit [/ QUOTE ] you officially turned in your papers? [/ QUOTE ] nah, actually played live on Monday, but still haven't decided re: online. berating live is for table captains and jfish.
|
|
#56
06-21-2007, 04:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: filthy cleans up
[ QUOTE ]
[censored] seriously, Daliman, thought you played at least higher than 1/2nl. "c/c the river because QK will bet it". bet the fking river..... QK will definitely call as will a much lighter range than will bet it. this is like basic theory, come on. [/ QUOTE ] It helps if you understand what your post is telling people. You made it sound like very few hands we beat are betting the river if checked to, and I responded by showing many hands that WILL bet that we beat, plus there are hands that beat us that may actually bet less than our bet on the river. Also, the point isn't how many hands will bet vs how many will call, it is that in an instance where you have a vulnerable hand, and may fold to a raise, and possibly even be folding the best hand when doing so, c/c'ing has far less variance, is more profitable in many cases, reduces the chances of getting outplayed, and even has the metagame bonus of not letting people thinkl a river check is always a greeen light to steal. Also, insults aren't necessary, and yeah, I play higher than 1-2, 90% HU too.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
