#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
In the Illinois primary I will be selecting from the available Green Party candidates.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
Paging andyfox...
our presumptive next president hasn't gotten a vote yet. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
They have primaries for the Green Party in Illinois? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
[ QUOTE ]
If only 2+2 politics forum had their own country, the budget might get balanced. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] fyp seriously, poker players balancing the budget... el oh el |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If only 2+2 had their own country, the budget might get balanced. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Pick a spot to start 2+2landia and I will move my freind. [/ QUOTE ] http://freestateproject.org/ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
[ QUOTE ]
They have primaries for the Green Party in Illinois? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Yup, we are getting the 3,000(5,000 in reality) needed signatures for at least 3 up to 5 of our presidential candidates. I think they might be doing the same thing in California, I am not sure though. We received major party status in Illinois because we passed the 5% thresh hold in the 2006 gubernatorial race. So, we are attempting to do some major things here in Illinois. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] They have primaries for the Green Party in Illinois? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Yup, we are getting the 3,000(5,000 in reality) needed signatures for at least 3 up to 5 of our presidential candidates. I think they might be doing the same thing in California, I am not sure though. We received major party status in Illinois because we passed the 5% thresh hold in the 2006 gubernatorial race. So, we are attempting to do some major things here in Illinois. [/ QUOTE ] Are you sure it's not just you and my dad? Have any dead people signed the petition? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] They have primaries for the Green Party in Illinois? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Yup, we are getting the 3,000(5,000 in reality) needed signatures for at least 3 up to 5 of our presidential candidates. I think they might be doing the same thing in California, I am not sure though. We received major party status in Illinois because we passed the 5% thresh hold in the 2006 gubernatorial race. So, we are attempting to do some major things here in Illinois. [/ QUOTE ] Are you sure it's not just you and my dad? Have any dead people signed the petition? [/ QUOTE ] There are a couple more people than your dad and myself. Also, there are no dead people on our petitions...us Greens hate being compared to the democrats. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
Jesus. Looks like the Ron Paul supporters have spammed another online poll....
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
[ QUOTE ]
Jesus. Looks like the Ron Paul supporters have spammed another online poll.... [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I've been shipping people here from a dozen other sites to get them to vote on it. |
|
|