Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-05-2006, 07:26 PM
Ansky Ansky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: pokersavvyplus.com!
Posts: 13,541
Default Re: Weirdest JJ I\'ve played in a while

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
given the stack pf of shorty, i'd def reraise pf. im curious why u didnt?

[/ QUOTE ]utg prob has like QQ+ since he's utg, so he's tryign to spike a set

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL U SO FUNNY
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-05-2006, 07:40 PM
billyjex billyjex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,918
Default Re: Weirdest JJ I\'ve played in a while

[ QUOTE ]
given the stack pf of shorty, i'd def reraise pf. im curious why u didnt?

[/ QUOTE ]

no good reason not to reraise preflop
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-05-2006, 07:40 PM
DJ Sensei DJ Sensei is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: pushing it to the limit
Posts: 7,419
Default Re: Weirdest JJ I\'ve played in a while

call preflop is alright, if it'll get BB to stick around with a worse hand and pay you off more. generally though, I think reraising here is better.

flop, i prefer a lead of about 1/3-1/2 shorty's stack (if thats a reasonable amount) so that BB can call that, shorty pushes, and you can come back over the top to push out BB and take his dead moneys.

turn... i guess theres not much else you can do.

river is fine. he'll often fold, and if he doesnt thats cool.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-05-2006, 08:27 PM
donkey donkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 738
Default Re: Weirdest JJ I\'ve played in a while

[ QUOTE ]

flop, i prefer a lead of about 1/3-1/2 shorty's stack (if thats a reasonable amount) so that BB can call that, shorty pushes, and you can come back over the top to push out BB and take his dead moneys.


[/ QUOTE ]

ya that sounds really sweet if it works. my line of choice would be to openpush and have BB call with 23off and shorty instacall with 44.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-05-2006, 09:12 PM
cero_z cero_z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: k Tight
Posts: 2,339
Default results and comments

[ QUOTE ]
Why didn't you reraise pf to get it all in with shorty?

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree that's the default play. In this case, I decided to call, because I was under the impression that shorty was very tight. I didn't feel like I had a very +EV situation shoving against his range (though it's certainly slightly +EV at worst). I decided to call and see the flop, where I might get him to shove or pay off with much less equity. I didn't have a ton of hands on him, but his pfr was 9. I figured that for opening UTG, he'd be tighter than that. How do people feel about that thinking?

As far as MDMA's comment that my river bet was too small, I felt like it painted the picture of a Q, without risking my whole stack on the off chance the BB held a Q. I don't think most people fold for a pot bet ever, whereas double-pot bets in small pots are rarely bluffs, it seems. I think I'd usually bet the pot or shove if I did have a Q, unless someone had seen one of my 2 x pot bluffs get caught. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Anyway, the BB actually held QT and of course called. Funny that playing this hand differently at many different points would've alternately led me to win a small pot, chop with the shorty, or lose my whole stack (if me and the BB played fast on the flop). Then, I also could've easily lost practically nothing, instead of 400.

Thanks for the comments; feel free to add anything else.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-05-2006, 11:17 PM
FoxwoodsFiend FoxwoodsFiend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 4,497
Default Re: results and comments

[ QUOTE ]
Funny that playing this hand differently at many different points would've alternately led me to win a small pot, chop with the shorty, or lose my whole stack (if me and the BB played fast on the flop). Then, I also could've easily lost practically nothing, instead of 400.

Thanks for the comments; feel free to add anything else.

[/ QUOTE ]

Party has continuous shuffle, so the next cards would have been different if you'd taken a different line, and hence you probably wouldn't have lost a big pot too often against QT.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-06-2006, 12:00 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Weirdest JJ I\'ve played in a while

[ QUOTE ]
I think I like a lead here on the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-06-2006, 12:04 AM
fslexcduck fslexcduck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 4,531
Default Re: results and comments

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Funny that playing this hand differently at many different points would've alternately led me to win a small pot, chop with the shorty, or lose my whole stack (if me and the BB played fast on the flop). Then, I also could've easily lost practically nothing, instead of 400.

Thanks for the comments; feel free to add anything else.

[/ QUOTE ]

Party has continuous shuffle, so the next cards would have been different if you'd taken a different line, and hence you probably wouldn't have lost a big pot too often against QT.

[/ QUOTE ]

translation:

your donkey ass acts a little quicker and you pair the board and ship his stack.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-06-2006, 01:02 AM
cero_z cero_z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: k Tight
Posts: 2,339
Default Re: results and comments

[ QUOTE ]
translation:

your donkey ass acts a little quicker and you pair the board and ship his stack.

[/ QUOTE ]

Doh! cerowned.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-06-2006, 01:45 AM
Jeff W Jeff W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,079
Default Re: Weirdest JJ I\'ve played in a while

I'd reraise pre flop. Post flop, I'd lead flop for $90 to whipsaw BB and evade a check behind from shorty.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.