Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-23-2007, 04:15 AM
fabrice dhamma fabrice dhamma is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1
Default Re: The Mathematics of poker by Bill Chen & some dude...

This is the most interesting book I had on the subject
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-23-2007, 04:37 AM
WiltOnTilt WiltOnTilt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: formerly KowCiller
Posts: 1,443
Default Re: The Mathematics of poker by Bill Chen & some dude...

[ QUOTE ]
"if you want to reach a wide audience"


I never got the impression they wanted to reach a wide audience.

[/ QUOTE ]

poor assumption on my part. i thought they wanted to sell books.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-23-2007, 03:13 PM
clowntable clowntable is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 7,076
Default Re: The Mathematics of poker by Bill Chen & some dude...

I consider it to be the best poker book I own (I got 30ish, mainly NL)
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-23-2007, 03:29 PM
Jzo19 Jzo19 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 828
Default Re: The Mathematics of poker by Bill Chen & some dude...

great book ,ive probably learned more about poker in this book than most other books on holdem but i still got many many reads b4 i grasp most of the concepts ..
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-24-2007, 01:54 PM
johnnyrocket johnnyrocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 8 tabling and raising all donk bets
Posts: 3,679
Default Re: The Mathematics of poker by Bill Chen & some dude...

[ QUOTE ]
I just started reading this book. I consider myself above average at "poker math" -- specifically EV calc type stuff. I graduated with a comp sci degree so i'm not too foreign to formal math...

I think it's hilarious how many greek symbols and equations they have in first section marked "Basics". I'm understanding the book so far, although I had to re-read a few pages when i got momentarily lost, but I can't imagine how joe-average poker player could possibly understand the concepts starting off in the "Basics" section.

They should have done a better job dumbing it down and/or removing many of the equations/greek symbols/math lingo until at least later in the book. I know being math guys they feel the need to build the "foundation" of ideas so they can build on it later, but if you want to reach a wide audience it's simply not a good strategy to keep people interested. I have one friend who tried to read this book and threw it out 2 chapters in because of all the graphs/equations/and "foreign letters" that people w/o a math background don't understand.

That said I'm looking forward to reading the rest of the book for myself so I can translate it to others.

WoT

[/ QUOTE ]

i am in engineering and u said the book is mostly statistics, i cant really think how u expect to not have any of this notation, this is used in almost any statistical calculation
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-24-2007, 01:58 PM
johnnyrocket johnnyrocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 8 tabling and raising all donk bets
Posts: 3,679
Default Re: The Mathematics of poker by Bill Chen & some dude...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


exp(2*(300^2)*(1.13333^2/1.5^4)) = 15.929


[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks again senor Jerrod.
I understand phi now thanks. And to give a little something back to 2+2 community to calculate the phi of a value in Excel use NORMSDIST function.

I'm still baffled though in at least one spot. I worked out that exp(2.768141347) = 15.929, but the figure in brackets here appears to be equal to 45668.86716, the exp(45668.867169) is massive of course. Am I reading the equation wrong or missing out on a bracket somewhere? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

he may have taken the natural log and u worded this a little weird? i dont have a calc in front of me but natural log is the inverse of exp so it would be much smaller, i'll try it on a calc later if i find mine
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.