Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2007, 02:30 PM
MyPTBB100isPOOP MyPTBB100isPOOP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 193
Default 1-2NL FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT

Assume you made the mistake of getting involved with this hand in this fashion, vs a 24/18, agressive opener. Assume he bets at least 50% of his range on this flop, which is prob like 66+,A5s+,K9s+,Q9s+,J9s+,ATo+,KTo+,QTo+. For the sake of argument, is a call better, or a raise better and why do you believe so? I think a raise is best because it will FOLD OUT ALL THE HANDS WE BEAT. OR is it best equity wise to wait for a blank to fall on the turn, have it check to us so we can bet and fold out hands that we beat?

SB: $323.15
BB: $187.00
UTG: $148.70
CO: $199.00
Hero (BTN): $227.90

Preflop: Hero is dealt Ad2d(5 Players)
UTG folds, CO raises to $8.00, Hero calls $8.00, SB folds, BB calls $6.00

Flop: ($25) 3c9cAc (3 Players)
BB folds, CO bets $17.00, Hero.....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-13-2007, 02:36 PM
kolotoure kolotoure is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Raising the flop
Posts: 8,167
Default Re: 1-2NL FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT

How is making a raise where every worse hand folds and every better hand calls a good idea?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2007, 02:44 PM
MyPTBB100isPOOP MyPTBB100isPOOP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 193
Default Re: 1-2NL FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT

[ QUOTE ]
How is making a raise where every worse hand folds and every better hand calls a good idea?

[/ QUOTE ]

this is the point that i wanted to argue about, but i want a few others to chime in first. Its something i thought alot about last night, and it has to do with these kind of board textures. Give it some thought, but im convinced its a good thing......
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-13-2007, 02:46 PM
amoeba amoeba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,353
Default Re: 1-2NL FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT

I'm more questioning of your read that he bets 50% of his holdings on this monotone multiway flop.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-13-2007, 02:49 PM
HERE_2_gamble_ HERE_2_gamble_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 590
Default Re: 1-2NL FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT

so its clear, when he(someone) shoves, whadda ya do?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-13-2007, 02:50 PM
MyPTBB100isPOOP MyPTBB100isPOOP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 193
Default Re: 1-2NL FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT

[ QUOTE ]
I'm more questioning of your read that he bets 50% of his holdings on this monotone multiway flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Although thats not the point of this argument, I can certainly see an aggressive opener raising 36% and firing a cbet with 100% of his range on any flop. I think that would be close to standard. Especially if he concieves it likely that my cc range on the button is like 90% likely to be pps and Suitedcons.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-13-2007, 02:50 PM
Unknown Soldier Unknown Soldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,587
Default Re: 1-2NL FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT

you make money by getting the hands that you beat to CALL your bet/raise.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-13-2007, 03:17 PM
MyPTBB100isPOOP MyPTBB100isPOOP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 193
Default Re: 1-2NL FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT

[ QUOTE ]
you make money by getting the hands that you beat to CALL your bet/raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is of course the stock logic, and id say in most situations that its the most +EV way to think of it. However me posing this question, in my mind, presupposes that i already understand that concept, but am alluding to a different one.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-13-2007, 03:18 PM
MyPTBB100isPOOP MyPTBB100isPOOP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 193
Default Re: 1-2NL FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT

to make it easier, assume that we can only call or raise in the hand we are talking about, that is important.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-13-2007, 03:28 PM
ttgirl ttgirl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 244
Default Re: 1-2NL FOR THE SAKE OF ARGUMENT

no way hes cbetting 50% of his range here. i guess raising is better so bb doesnt get direct odds to draw with like the jack of clubs or something, but this is just a terrible spot to be in. obviously were not raising for value but to protect our hand here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.