Breaking news in Medical field

WhoIam · #1 11-28-2007, 01:01 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i think its bad news for gold digging whores who hit up successful guys to have them pay child support when the kid is not even his. do a google on the study.....25% of the guys pay child support to kids that arent theirs !!!

[/ QUOTE ]

I gotta tell you, 25% sounds awfully suspicious. Sounds too much like the old canard of 10% of fathers raising kids that are biologically not theirs.
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/071019.html

[/ QUOTE ] But this 25% isn't a random sample, it's most likely men who believe there's a real possibility the child isn't theirs.

NT! · #2 11-28-2007, 01:11 AM

HAY GUISE DID |U|O HERE THAT 25% OF AUSSIES ARE |BAS|TARDS

DONT TELL ADSMAN IMO

ikestoys · #3 11-28-2007, 02:55 AM

[ QUOTE ]
BTW, a guy called in the show and told a weird story. He had a doubt 5-6 years on that the kid wasnt his that he was paying child support for. When he got dna tested, the family court judge ignored it and he still has to pay.

[/ QUOTE ]

In most states, if your wife has a baby while youre married, you are responsible for it, whether or not its yours.

pretty [censored] up imo

neuroman · #4 11-28-2007, 03:16 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
BTW, a guy called in the show and told a weird story. He had a doubt 5-6 years on that the kid wasnt his that he was paying child support for. When he got dna tested, the family court judge ignored it and he still has to pay.

[/ QUOTE ]

In most states, if your wife has a baby while youre married, you are responsible for it, whether or not its yours.

pretty [censored] up imo

[/ QUOTE ]
Unless you show otherwise, I think. The problem is once you assume responsibility, finding out later won't do you any good, because courts will order support in order to best provide for the child. If you've got a 6 year old bastard you've been feeding and clothing for his whole life and the biological dad is M.I.A. --> tough [censored] for you.

Also, I'm pretty disappointed by everyone in this thread who didn't read Quicksilver's link but are continuing to spout off about non-paternity statistics.