|
|
#1
10-15-2007, 09:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Stack-to-pot Ratios - How can we utilise this for omaha?
For those of you that haven't read it, professional no limit hold em is the bees knees.
I imagine most of the regulars here have read it; How do you think SPR's can be incorporated into PLO? I've been thinking about this over the past couple of days; do you want say 3 pot size bets on flop when you have a set? more or less against an unpredictable opponent? More or less in/out of position? The list goes one but i'm aiming for a high quality post with some interesting discussion; thanks 
|
|
#2
10-16-2007, 01:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stack-to-pot Ratios - How can we utilise this for omaha?
i think there is more interesting discussion on decyphering your post.
good god man, wtf r u talking about?
|
|
#3
10-16-2007, 01:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stack-to-pot Ratios - How can we utilise this for omaha?
bees knees??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
I think I'd like to know the flop before I play my set... how about some examples before we throw all our money in
|
|
#5
10-16-2007, 04:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stack-to-pot Ratios - How can we utilise this for omaha?
Why are you all jumping on this guy? This is maybe the first interesting question the omaha forum has seen in ages.
|
|
#8
10-16-2007, 10:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stack-to-pot Ratios - How can we utilise this for omaha?
yes nice replies folks; i know my posts have not been great but give me some slack please!
i'll repost the question in a better form
|
|
#9
10-16-2007, 11:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stack-to-pot Ratios - How can we utilise this for omaha?
There was a thread about this a couple of weeks ago. Other than a few posters stating that it doesn't apply to Omaha, it was pretty much ignored.
|
|
#10
10-16-2007, 01:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stack-to-pot Ratios - How can we utilise this for omaha?
seeing as this post is going nowhere; i'll assume everyone has read slotboom; Essentially, his shortstack strategy IS SPR based;
For example he states that in a 6-max game he'd still try to sit to the left of a maniac; but he'd up his buy in to 30 or 40 big blinds; Now not being the greatest analyst on these here forums i cant link the two well enough in words and numbers to 'prove' that the two thought processes are the same; maybe someone can help me there; SPR is not new, the terminology however is; and there is no doubt in my mind it is useful in all forms of pot/no-limit poker! food for thoughts perhaps; if anyone is genuinely interested in researching this please pm me.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
