Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Community

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 11-29-2007, 02:51 PM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

Mondo,
The analogy didn't say anything about hum publishing an article under his name that was written by somebody else. Even if that is the case than the analogy is saying him taking credit for the win is unethical not him selling his account.
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 11-29-2007, 02:53 PM
jcg2005 jcg2005 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: \"well btch im cuter\"
Posts: 636
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

I'm gonna let the ppl who r smarter than myself finish this discussion. Sry to stir up [censored]
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 11-29-2007, 03:01 PM
raptor517 raptor517 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 7,453
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

[ QUOTE ]
G2cu,
Good post and it was not riddled with spelling errors.

[/ QUOTE ]

ban g2cu for multiaccounting his 2p2 account?
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 11-29-2007, 03:02 PM
Mondogarage Mondogarage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Section 238, Row 9
Posts: 1,213
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

[ QUOTE ]
Mondo,
The analogy didn't say anything about hum publishing an article under his name that was written by somebody else. Even if that is the case than the analogy is saying him taking credit for the win is unethical not him selling his account.

[/ QUOTE ]

Both are unethical. I thought it would have gone without saying that, in the analogy, the article would still have been published under his name alone. I give people too much credit for being able to follow a thought to its natural conclusion sometimes. My bad.

The best analogy is the dude who compared it to someone taking over a seat at a live table.

I don't know how you enforce such things, but really, it should be plainly spelled out on every poker site that taking over an account for any reason in any tournament is a bannable offense, and accounts/money will be confiscated.

Obviously, a site can't tell if two people are sitting in the same room and looking at the same monitor, but that would clear up most situations where two IP addresses play the same tourney. Even if it can't always be proven or stopped 100% of the time, does not make the act any less unethical.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 11-29-2007, 03:12 PM
raptor517 raptor517 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 7,453
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

as far as this topic goes.. i think sites need to make some sort of release, emails, popups when u log in, etc, that clearly define a list of rules. i mean, i signed up for my accounts 3+ years ago, and back then i didnt think that if my computer crashed, and then exploded, if i called my buddy and told him to play my account and finish up the tourney and id ship him a %, it was a big deal.

i agree with andrew on this, in that sites need to make it ABC to understand the rules. everything is so sketchy and there are no clearly defined lines. when there is no clear rule on how everything plays out, stuff like this happens and will continue to happen until there is. i dont know anything about the ftp incident, but i know chris fairly well and think hes a great guy. again, im not defending him in this incident as i dont know what happened, but thats my thoughts on him as a person.

as far as the stars win goes, i know that durrr staked him for it, and im also 100% sure that durrr did not take over the account. dota is always more important than silly little tournaments. but yea, back to the main point, until sites clear up what their exact rules on things like this, INCLUDING stuff like coaching (which im pretty sure is allowed), one player to a hand (which is not enforced and is clearly stated to not be a rule), etc, then these things will continue to happen. ok continue the war.
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 11-29-2007, 03:22 PM
inyourface inyourface is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 480
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

it will NEVER get old listening to clowns like Eagles defend cheaters. They always find a new pathetic excuse.
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 11-29-2007, 03:33 PM
Merek007 Merek007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: yielding to temptation
Posts: 201
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

[ QUOTE ]
it will NEVER get old listening to clowns like Eagles defend cheaters. They always find a new pathetic excuse.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 11-29-2007, 03:35 PM
parker_posey parker_posey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Droppin Loads imo
Posts: 79
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

POKER --- THE NEW TEAM SPORT
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 11-29-2007, 03:42 PM
raptor517 raptor517 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 7,453
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

[ QUOTE ]
POKER --- THE NEW TEAM SPORT

[/ QUOTE ]

pokerbowl
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 11-29-2007, 03:49 PM
ActionJeff ActionJeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: though my mind could think I still was a mad man
Posts: 1,467
Default Re: Chris Vaughn BluffMag multiaccounting

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
edit, also to In your face: your comment is completely untrue and out of line.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you too think that naming and shaming cheaters is 'getting out of hand'?

This coming from the same ActionJeff that publicly condemns multiaccounters but has decided to keep the damning evidence to himself. I assume for the good of the MTT community?

Please tell me how what I have said here is souring to hear?

[/ QUOTE ]

Chris's FTP win was disqualified, so I'm not sure why you think he kept any damning evidence to himself.

[/ QUOTE ]

From this thread - http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...rt=all&vc=1

comes this quote as the synopsis -

[ QUOTE ]
That's it. You know who you are, I know who you are, and if you really have the nerve to keep doing this crap out of greed and disrespect for the rules, then you better at least not tell one [censored] person, because you are putting a lot of faith in your peers right now, and not all of them are as considerate and discreet as I am.

-Jeff

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not trying to turn this thread against Jeff but it's ironic and getting annoying seeing him up there on the moral high ground.

[/ QUOTE ]

when did I defend cheaters or keep evidence to myself in this thread? wtf are you talking about, are you serious?

temp Ban for trolling please
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.