Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #421  
Old 09-17-2007, 03:42 PM
DonkeyKongSr DonkeyKongSr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Home of Best Hockey Team Ever
Posts: 3,487
Default Re: Official 2007 NHL Offseason Thread

I just signed up (Mighty Donks). I also just realized I accidentally missed a draft for another league. My "awesome lineup"...

1. (7) Jarome Iginla RW
2. (18) Martin St. Louis RW
3. (31) Daniel Sedin LW
4. (42) Thomas Vanek LW
5. (55) Henrik Sedin C
6. (66) Matt Carle D
7. (79) Michael Cammalleri C
8. (90) Martin Biron G
9. (103) Nikolai Khabibulin G
10. (114) Brian Campbell D
11. (127) Christian Ehrhoff D
12. (138) Michal Rozsival D
13. (151) Daymond Langkow C
14. (162) David Vyborny RW
15. (175) Martin Erat LW
16. (186) Thomas Greiss G


That's some [censored] goaltending and D (especially considering I have two effing Sharks [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]). My offense isn't so bad. Wonder Twin powers activate!
Reply With Quote
  #422  
Old 09-17-2007, 10:48 PM
4 High 4 High is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Team Pretendinitis
Posts: 3,617
Default Re: Official 2007 NHL Offseason Thread

Someone rate my fantasy draft

1. (2) Dany Heatley RW
2. (15) Jason Spezza C
3. (18) Ilya Kovalchuk LW
4. (31) Daniel Sedin LW
5. (34) Henrik Lundqvist G
6. (47) Patrick Marleau C
7. (50) Thomas Vanek LW
8. (63) Bryan McCabe D
9. (66) Zdeno Chara D
10. (79) Justin Williams RW
11. (82) Ryan Miller G
12. (95) Sergei Zubov D
13. (98) Markus Naslund RW
14. (111) Manny Legace G
15. (114) Paul Kariya LW
16. (127) Patrik Elias C
17. (130) Joe Corvo D
18. (143) Roman Hamrlik D
19. (146) Nathan Horton C
20. (159) Martin Erat LW
21. (162) Sami Salo D
22. (175) Fredrik Norrena G
23. (178) J.P. Dumont RW
24. (191) Michael Ryder RW

I am likely moving Norrena for Budaj as well.
Reply With Quote
  #423  
Old 09-17-2007, 10:58 PM
g-bebe g-bebe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: cheese
Posts: 1,585
Default Re: Official 2007 NHL Offseason Thread

I think Vanek, McCabe, and Miller at the spots you got them at are pretty good deals.

BTW, bluef0x, is the fantasy pool you're talking about the one I'm already in? (2p2 league?)
Reply With Quote
  #424  
Old 09-17-2007, 11:00 PM
swede554 swede554 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Looking for a new car
Posts: 1,541
Default Re: Official 2007 NHL Offseason Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Bump... need more people for fantasy hockey!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

I might be interested. I kind of know how it works but if someone wants to brief me that be great. Also, besides the inital draft how involved with trades and stuff do you have to be?
Reply With Quote
  #425  
Old 09-18-2007, 09:12 PM
bluef0x bluef0x is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 2,295
Default Re: Official 2007 NHL Offseason Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Bump... need more people for fantasy hockey!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

I might be interested. I kind of know how it works but if someone wants to brief me that be great. Also, besides the inital draft how involved with trades and stuff do you have to be?

[/ QUOTE ]

You don't have to be involved, but I'm sure everyone would prefer that the league is active. As long as you are turning in your lineups and trying to compete, I'm happy.

G-bebe, you're in the league.

If anyone wants to join, it's league 20428 and the password is supbro. Live draft is scheduled for Thurs at 7:45PST, but I can change that if anyone can't make it.


In real NHL news, the Pitt-Buff outdoor game is sold out and the NHL BOG has agreed to change the schedule for next season. Most likely going to reduce the divisional games to 6 games per rival instead of 8 and play every team at least once.
Reply With Quote
  #426  
Old 09-18-2007, 09:27 PM
DonkeyKongSr DonkeyKongSr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Home of Best Hockey Team Ever
Posts: 3,487
Default Re: Official 2007 NHL Offseason Thread

[ QUOTE ]
...and the NHL BOG has agreed to change the schedule for next season. Most likely going to reduce the divisional games to 6 games per rival instead of 8 and play every team at least once.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, it's probably going back to the old way. Everyone got their panties all in a bunch over the current schedule, but as far as I can recall, it was really just intended to be a money saving quick fix post-lockout (less travel expenses for some of the more strapped teams). Now that they'll complete a cycle of seasons in that format (every team should have hosted every other team at least once since the lockout), they can switch back to a "play everyone" schedule again.
Reply With Quote
  #427  
Old 09-18-2007, 09:41 PM
Triumph36 Triumph36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Osi Ukin\'-yora
Posts: 9,388
Default Re: Official 2007 NHL Offseason Thread

[ QUOTE ]

In real NHL news, the Pitt-Buff outdoor game is sold out and the NHL BOG has agreed to change the schedule for next season. Most likely going to reduce the divisional games to 6 games per rival instead of 8 and play every team at least once.

[/ QUOTE ]

ugh. i liked the change to the schedule. i don't need to see more of the edmonton oilers or minnesota wild.

i found that when i had the center ice package, i would invariably watch eastern conference matchups.
Reply With Quote
  #428  
Old 09-18-2007, 09:41 PM
bluef0x bluef0x is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 2,295
Default Re: Official 2007 NHL Offseason Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
...and the NHL BOG has agreed to change the schedule for next season. Most likely going to reduce the divisional games to 6 games per rival instead of 8 and play every team at least once.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, it's probably going back to the old way. Everyone got their panties all in a bunch over the current schedule, but as far as I can recall, it was really just intended to be a money saving quick fix post-lockout (less travel expenses for some of the more strapped teams). Now that they'll complete a cycle of seasons in that format (every team should have hosted every other team at least once since the lockout), they can switch back to a "play everyone" schedule again.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, it seems like the Eastern teams finally agreed to change.... not really sure why they would, though. They save quite a bit of money playing opponents that are a drive away rather than across the country. They also stay in the same time zone. Not to mention the eastern rivalries are usually guaranteed sell-outs. It's a pretty big advantage business-wise as well as competition-wise. Maybe the owners realized the league would generate and retain more fans with the new schedule and that would pay off in the long run? I really don't know...

Glad it's changing as a fan though [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #429  
Old 09-18-2007, 10:47 PM
Wes Mantooth Wes Mantooth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC
Posts: 2,826
Default Re: Official 2007 NHL Offseason Thread






3.5 month offseason is way too long
Reply With Quote
  #430  
Old 09-19-2007, 01:18 AM
swede554 swede554 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Looking for a new car
Posts: 1,541
Default Re: Official 2007 NHL Offseason Thread

[ QUOTE ]

If anyone wants to join, it's league 20428 and the password is supbro. Live draft is scheduled for Thurs at 7:45PST, but I can change that if anyone can't make it.


[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, I signed up, team name NHLswede.
I won't be available until nxt monday though for a live draft, but if its held before that according to the FAQ I can just pre-select a list of player I'd like and if they're available I get them, and if not, it will automatically pick the highest ranked player (according to yahoo fantasy) for me correct?

Also, not sure if this idea will garner any support, but anyone be interested in making a small wager for this say around $20-50? Transfer and holding of money could be done on Stars or Full Tilt. I wouldn't feel comfortable holding the $, but I wouldn't mind shipping it to someone in the league to hold if someone would like to. Obv if that person decides to be a douche and run of with the money that would suck, but it would be such a small amount I'm not really worried about that.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.