|
|
#41
11-20-2007, 01:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
[ QUOTE ]
only thing i can suggest is open less from SB and win more at showdown. [/ QUOTE ] SB is fine -(.06) is well below average of -(.11) 47% W$ AT showdown is also fine for your style of play 
|
|
#45
11-20-2007, 02:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
Just woke up and read through the responses, thanks for all the input guys! Although almost every advice given is contradicted by someone elses so I'll just keep an open mind. These are just numbers anyways.
About the amount of tables, jfish from MSNL is known to 1-table (I read about a 15 hour session recently, whew) and aba also has a maximum of 4 tables to play optimally. Then there are people like CTS who can multitable like a machine. In conclusion I don't think it's necessary to play lots of tables to be successful. Hmm. Well at least as long as I don't stay at NL100 forever. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] But the plan is to crush midstakes by next summer and go from there.
|
|
#46
11-20-2007, 05:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] try the software forum for software to make it easier to multitable. [/ QUOTE ] Why not just name the software that he should look into? [/ QUOTE ] 'cause there's a variety of software options that might work for him, depending on his needs/sites/etc. i'm fairly confident that OP is an intelligent person, so he should be able to figure it out for himself.
|
|
#48
11-20-2007, 06:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
[ QUOTE ]
fwiw you shouldnt worry about winning more at showdown. can anyone guess why? [/ QUOTE ] Because going to showdown sucks.
|
|
#49
11-20-2007, 06:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] fwiw you shouldnt worry about winning more at showdown. can anyone guess why? [/ QUOTE ] Because going to showdown sucks. [/ QUOTE ] It depends. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Poker Stars, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter CO: $210.60 BTN: $200 SB: $268 Hero (BB): $203 UTG: $300.25 MP: $176.80 Pre-Flop: J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (BB) UTG folds, MP calls $2, CO folds, <font color="red">BTN raises to $10</font>, SB folds, Hero calls $8, MP folds Flop: ($23) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">BTN bets $16</font>, Hero calls $16 Turn: ($55) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">BTN bets $42</font>, Hero calls $42 River: ($139) 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, <font color="red">BTN bets $86</font>, Hero calls $86 Results: $311 Pot ($3 Rake) BTN showed 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (a pair of Nines) and LOST (-$154 NET) Hero showed J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (two pair, Aces and Nines) and WON $308 (+$154 NET)
|
|
#50
11-20-2007, 06:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
[ QUOTE ]
fwiw you shouldnt worry about winning more at showdown. can anyone guess why? [/ QUOTE ] I haven't really thought about this. Semibluffing for instance leads to showing down weak hands on the river?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
