Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-13-2007, 09:32 AM
Bulletproof Monk Bulletproof Monk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: THREE OH SIX AM
Posts: 3,893
Default Re: A standard decision in sb.

i cant believe not one person has asked what stack sizes are.

that pretty much makes our decision
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-13-2007, 09:37 AM
RepulseMonkey RepulseMonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 150
Default Re: A standard decision in sb.

[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, but i would like to have some more discussion on this.
As mentioned villains 3bet range is incredibly wide and we can't set-mine + we're OOP. We need to play our PP for "handvalue". Often we will face 2 if not 3 barrels of action. Most often our hand will not be able to stand the heat.
Should we just complete with the lower PPs instead of raising them?
Sorry im pretty confused in this spot.

Btw. Great post thac. Your post really add some depth to this discussion.

My homeboy plato would like to tell you something.

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something".

[/ QUOTE ]

Call with 7s-9s. Dump lower PPs, 4 bet larger PPs.

You also need to throw in some random 4 bets with your "lower value PPs" especially if he's folding to 4 bets.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-13-2007, 10:25 AM
Suwalski Suwalski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Simply not there
Posts: 587
Default Re: A standard decision in sb.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, but i would like to have some more discussion on this.
As mentioned villains 3bet range is incredibly wide and we can't set-mine + we're OOP. We need to play our PP for "handvalue". Often we will face 2 if not 3 barrels of action. Most often our hand will not be able to stand the heat.
Should we just complete with the lower PPs instead of raising them?
Sorry im pretty confused in this spot.

Btw. Great post thac. Your post really add some depth to this discussion.

My homeboy plato would like to tell you something.

"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something".

[/ QUOTE ]

I think Thac's sigh was legitimate.

I've read the OP at least 18 times, and I'm surprised at all the 'serious' responses to this post when you haven't even said how many BB's deep you are.

This is the most important piece of information which you haven't included.

So before you start digging at someone sighing to your post, maybe you could check it has all the relevant info for someone to be able to help you...?

[/ QUOTE ]

If he really wanted to give a good answer he could have included what he would do in different scenarios with different stacksizes. He could also just point out that stacksiez were missing. But the "sigh" dosen't do anything.

I apologies for forgetting relevant stacksizes.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-13-2007, 10:30 AM
RepulseMonkey RepulseMonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 150
Default Re: A standard decision in sb.

it might make sense if we all assume 100bb stacks in "hypothetical" situations unless otherwise stated.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.