|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LC - You People Need To Give Villains More Credit From Time To Time
are you unstuck in time?
1-2 players are 90% lagtards |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LC - You People Need To Give Villains More Credit From Time To Tim
[ QUOTE ]
are you unstuck in time? 1-2 players are 90% lagtards [/ QUOTE ] Rubbish. At virtually every table I play there's at least one (LAG)TAG with stats like 28/19/2.3 or so, and usually some other player who maybe seems a bit too loose, and a little bit too aggressive, but well within reason, ie. 35/20/2.5 They actually play quite well. Then you have the typical 60/10/0.6 passives, and finally there's usually some tight nit with stats like 16/9/3.2, who didn't get the note it isn't full ring. Only occasionally do I see the 60/40/2.8 type. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LC - You People Need To Give Villains More Credit From Time To Tim
I think earlier one of my larger mistakes was thinking a 35/20/2.5 is an idiot and should be played back at accordingly. That cost me a lot of money.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LC - You People Need To Give Villains More Credit From Time To Tim
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] are you unstuck in time? 1-2 players are 90% lagtards [/ QUOTE ] Rubbish. At virtually every table I play there's at least one (LAG)TAG with stats like 28/19/2.3 or so, and usually some other player who maybe seems a bit too loose, and a little bit too aggressive, but well within reason, ie. 35/20/2.5 They actually play quite well. Then you have the typical 60/10/0.6 passives, and finally there's usually some tight nit with stats like 16/9/3.2, who didn't get the note it isn't full ring. Only occasionally do I see the 60/40/2.8 type. [/ QUOTE ] i'm about 28/21 and I consider myself a TAG. once again you show your full ring colors you nit. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] (j/k) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LC - You People Need To Give Villains More Credit From Time To Tim
In full ring these days "tight" is often 15/10 in my games. I even see 11/8 at times... I would consider 28/21 good at short handed, ie. semi-tight, but I think semi-tight is good. I meant (LAG)TAG as being between tight-aggressive and semi-tight-aggressive. An actual TAG I'm thinking more of 24/17 (which is generally what full ring players end up at if they pretend to play from middle position in short handed).
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LC - You People Need To Give Villains More Credit From Time To Tim
[ QUOTE ]
In full ring these days "tight" is often 15/10 in my games. I even see 11/8 at times... I would consider 28/21 good at short handed, ie. semi-tight, but I think semi-tight is good. I meant (LAG)TAG as being between tight-aggressive and semi-tight-aggressive. An actual TAG I'm thinking more of 24/17 (which is generally what full ring players end up at if they pretend to play from middle position in short handed). [/ QUOTE ] I pretty much agree with all of that. I actually think it is pretty tough to beat most 3/6 and up SH games if you play "TAG" 6max (ie 24/17 or whatever). There are enough laggy players that if you don't start opening up and iso-raising after them (and increasing your button steals) it really is hard to make much. |
|
|