|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What is a unit? | |||
| My average bet (in other words, I sometimes bet less than a unit). |
   
|
20 | 48.78% |
| My smallest bet (in other words, I always bet between 1 and x units). |
  
|
15 | 36.59% |
| What's a unit? I bet an amount proportional to my advantage (Kelly or some variation thereof). |
  
|
6 | 14.63% |
| Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#701
10-02-2007, 01:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
[ QUOTE ]
Fox Sports Rocky Mountain [/ QUOTE ] Pretty sure the Rox don't own or have a stake in that. 
|
|
#703
10-02-2007, 02:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
I had no money on the game and didnt care who won. It was an amazing game but McClelan and his 4 hour delay on calls was absurd. Being completely out of position for the last play of the game was inexcuseable.But what an amazing game.
|
|
#704
10-02-2007, 03:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
what a game!
kudos to giles for jumping into the wall trying to make the catch of his life, and then getting right back up to retrieve the ball. holliday scares me as a phils fan. They should've walked two to load up the bases. hoffman is done in san diego? I think more often than not, holliday is called out at home. TO PHILADELPHIA!
|
|
#705
10-02-2007, 03:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
[ QUOTE ]
Tuq, You ain't kidding. I now have a vested interest in Peavy owning the Rockies and winning a nice 2-0 games despite 5 good Fogg ininings. [/ QUOTE ] How's that vested interest working out for you, fat boy?
|
|
#707
10-02-2007, 11:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
[ QUOTE ]
All the rockies posters in this thread changed me from indifferent to wanting the Pads to win. Also more of Challenger being brilliant http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...Number=5914405 [/ QUOTE ] Cue up the Rolling Stones.
|
|
#708
10-02-2007, 11:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
For all those yesterday who thought I was full of it.
Pffffbut. Heh. Section 218, Row 4. Yeah baby. Bring on the Phillies.
|
|
#709
10-02-2007, 12:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
Will someone be kind enough to explain the Varlos/Challenger bet backstory? It's kinda funny how Challenger totally ignores those posts and just keeps on posting.
Also, bear in mind that someone taking the time to explain the bet will further expose Challenger and perhaps lead to Varlos getting paid (if he is in fact owed). Thanks.
|
|
#710
10-02-2007, 12:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
Challenger is Varlos' gimmick account
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
