|
|
|
|
#1
11-18-2007, 06:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: saving money vs set
I forgot to mention button was 37/19/2.5 but really hadn't gotten out of line against me previous to this - so I didn't think he was pulling a move.
|
|
#2
11-18-2007, 06:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: saving money vs set
On something like this, a dry flop, I sometimes spite-call the minbet and try to spike 2 pair, but really with KQ I would get out, you really only beat KJ here. With AK, I call the minraise, lead the turn, and fold if I get raised again.
|
|
#3
11-18-2007, 06:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: saving money vs set
[ QUOTE ]
I forgot to mention button was 37/19/2.5 but really hadn't gotten out of line against me previous to this - so I didn't think he was pulling a move. [/ QUOTE ] Easy raise imo then. AF of 2.5 with a VPIP of 37 means he's bluffing/semibluffing a reasonable amount of the time.
|
|
#4
11-18-2007, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: saving money vs set
What's that? Set!? Don't talk about a set! You kiddin me? A set!? (Jim Mora impression)
I think you give way too much credit. Why does it gotta be a set? Doesn't this guy re-raise with a PP PF when his PFR = 19 when it's 4-ways? Totally forgetting about the stats, there's a whole bunch of stuff he mins with. I believe a min raise is weak, so I just raise it right back with authority. There's so many hands he could have here, you gotta raise to see where you're at. I'll spite-call the min also on more dangerous boards where the odds are great but not here. Re-raise the dumb minner.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
