|
|
#11
05-27-2007, 05:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA vs 3 callers and baby flop
Fact that he c/red the field makes this very scary and a fold.
|
|
#13
05-27-2007, 05:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA vs 3 callers and baby flop
Seriously, you think Villain has a set rather than any other pair > 77% of the time? Or 81% of the time considering you'll hit your Ace on the turn 4% of the time?
|
|
#14
05-27-2007, 10:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA vs 3 callers and baby flop
no way i fold here. Chances of an over pair are almost like 2:1 to chances he beats aces. 2 pair leaves u 6 outs, trips leaves you 2 and a straight is just plain unlucky. I put it all in here and rake the pot most of the time imo. he might have like 67s
|
|
#15
05-27-2007, 10:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA vs 3 callers and baby flop
With position here, I am calling and reeval the turn here, without any real reads on this opponent. And 30 hands is nothing here, so we can't depend on PT for a ton of info.
Folding here is pretty weak tight considering that we have position on the villain, and we really don't know how the guy plays. If he leads strong into you again, def folding here, but you would be surprised how often someone will c/r the flop here, not realizing that he is in a multi-way pot here and hero's line is much stronger by c-betting it. I think there are plenty of retarted players who C/r an overpair here regardless of wether or not there are other people in the pot.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
