|
|
#11
09-27-2006, 12:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rutgers -3.5 @ South Florida
[ QUOTE ]
I'm almost certainly gonna take USF just because no one else wants to. [/ QUOTE ] Isn't that like shorting AMZN at 70 when everyone said it was overvalued...on it's way to 400? 
|
|
#12
09-27-2006, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rutgers -3.5 @ South Florida
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm almost certainly gonna take USF just because no one else wants to. [/ QUOTE ] Isn't that like shorting AMZN at 70 when everyone said it was overvalued...on it's way to 400? [/ QUOTE ] I sure hope not. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Seriously, this just seems to be a case where there is huge consensus on one side of a game. In spots like this, I like to take the other side. Who's keeping the line from skyrocketing? Plus, I bet small, and it's not like USF is only gonna cover 3% of the time. It can't be that disastrous. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#14
09-29-2006, 11:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rutgers -3.5 @ South Florida
Ship it!
It felt weird rooting against USF (on the two point conversion) after betting on them. Anti-public bets have done well so far. Auburn, TCU, and now Rutgers all fail to cover. I was lucky enough to grab BYU and USF.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
