|
|
#21
10-22-2007, 03:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100NL - Why do we call here?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] may be misclick (don't know how). [/ QUOTE ] done that when typing in a bet and accidentally add a digit. [/ QUOTE ] Hooray for raising to 43 instead of 4 at NL100. One time I raised to 73 instead of 7, on a straight steal. I hit enter more slowly now. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] 
|
|
#22
10-22-2007, 03:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $100NL - Why do we call here?
No, not an "easy" fold Joey.
We suckout against AA 20%. It is not AA the other 80%. In fact I would not put AA as an exclusive holding ever..... even a 9/1/1 guy. (You give no reference to amount of hands you have on villain). Plus table dynamics play a role here more than ranges IMHO. I would like the past two/three cycle history. Recap: I can't tell you whether I call or fold without more info. Period. But it's not an "easy" fold.
|
|
#23
10-22-2007, 04:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $100NL - Why do we call here?
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know if I have ever "accidentally" stuffed AI. [/ QUOTE ] So you've never meant to raise to say $7 in a 1/2 game and instead of highlighting the 4.00 that will show up and deleting the 4 accidentally deleted the . also? I know I have. I actually have a friend that did this with like $650 or so in front at 1/2. I was on aim with him at the time and he tells me that he accidently jammed 325 BB with KK UTG and someone was tanking. The guy in MP was a fish who didn't buy in full and had built a stack that covered my friend. He said that he didn't want to make the call for that much money, but had to and turned over AA finally. It held, but it almost allowed my friend to avoid a huge cooler.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
