What PTBB/100 is good?

[pokerlink]

Hi everyone.

What PTBB/100 is normal, good and great for 100NL? and also 200NL and 400 NL?

I am at 2,5 PTBB/100 at 100NL after 60k hands. Thinking I should aim for 5 PTBB/100 over 50k hands before moving up too 200NL. Is this too carefull?

I play 6 tables and aiming at 45-60k hands per month (right now 30k)

Sorry if this is one of those questions that is asked over and over again. Have searched but cant find any answer.

[Nielsio]

One million dollars.

[kolotoure]

[ QUOTE ]
One hundred billion dollars.

[/ QUOTE ]

[sixhigh]

winrate thread

[syphlix]

[ QUOTE ]

Sorry if this is one of those questions that is asked over and over again. Have searched but cant find any answer.

[/ QUOTE ]

i find that hard to believe...

but yea... at 100NL i'd say 20+BB/100 can certainly be considered great

[KLJ]

all of them

[Fonkey123]

I too want a serious answer. What's reasonable at 1/2 on stars? 5ptbb/100 right?

[MyTurn2Raise]

jeebus....does anyone read teh FAQ?



datamine fulltilt...find out the winrates of the regs

[KLJ]

[ QUOTE ]
I too want a serious answer. What's reasonable at 1/2 on stars? 5ptbb/100 right?

[/ QUOTE ]

im going to say 4 is the upper limit for all but 2-3 of the stars regs (carrot is one, but i'm not telling who the others are [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]). 100k hands was the sample size when we all had 5+ ptbb winrates, now that most winning players are only like 2-3, who knows.

obviously here comes the graph of one of the following:
1. party winrate
2. insignificant sample size
3. unsubstantiated claim

[HiBaCHi]

[ QUOTE ]
I too want a serious answer. What's reasonable at 1/2 on stars? 5ptbb/100 right?

[/ QUOTE ]

5ptbb/100 is reasonable on stars 1/2 for the very good regs. i think 8 is possible for the very best. this is considering at least 100k hands. any decent player can run hot for 10k-50k hands and think they are the [censored]. at any rate you should worry more about improving and moving up though.