|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: river decision
[ QUOTE ]
threeball, call cap. online players are so overaggro sometimes I think this is the only option. [/ QUOTE ] Interesting. So you aren't concerned that you're offering 2:1 that he has a better hand, considering that your hand is so plainly obvious and he's still raising? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: river decision
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] threeball, call cap. online players are so overaggro sometimes I think this is the only option. [/ QUOTE ] Interesting. So you aren't concerned that you're offering 2:1 that he has a better hand, considering that your hand is so plainly obvious and he's still raising? [/ QUOTE ] I see what you did there, I think. I'm not sure what you mean by "we're offering him two to one and he's still raising". I'm not very good at math. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: river decision
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not sure what you mean by "we're offering him two to one and he's still raising". I'm not very good at math. [/ QUOTE ] What I mean is this: If we 3-bet, we intend to call a cap. KT and 66 and KK will all surely cap this river, so we will lose 2 bets when behind one of these hands. On the other hand, hands we beat may not call, and they surely won't cap. So we are risking 2 bets to win 1 by 3-betting. |
|
|